Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kjam22

“A different propulsion method that doesn’t require 93457932475 gallons of fuel in a tank the size of a skyscraper.”

How about a propulsion system for space vehicles that requires NO fuel?

How about a propulsion system for planes that requires NO fuel?

How about a propulsion system for land vehicles (cars) that requires NO fuel?

How about a system for generating electricity for homes that requires NO fuel?

It is possible. Govt does not want any of this. Tesla knew how. Govt destroyed his work and tried to destroy him.

We would not need the grid. We would not need the Middle East or Chavez. We would not need big oil. But does anybody really care?


183 posted on 06/12/2007 6:20:29 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

You’re teasing. Have any links? Even Richard Hoaglund stuff. I’d love to see it.


202 posted on 06/12/2007 6:34:35 PM PDT by IslandJeff ("I used to care, but things have changed" - Robert Zimmerman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
It is possible. Govt does not want any of this. Tesla knew how. Govt destroyed his work and tried to destroy him.

What, just Tesla? C'mon. At least throw in a little Edgar Cayce to make it interesting. Even George Noory mixes it up a little now and then.

289 posted on 06/12/2007 7:51:43 PM PDT by ReignOfError (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson