Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative

That surprises me. I know the JT8D-2xx series are very good workhorse engines, but why wouldn’t the USAF go with more modern high-bypass CFMs when they re-engine the E-3 and E-8? That’s what they put on the KC-135, I think. Not to mention the fact that CFMs are still being manufactured.

Don’t get me wrong, I love JT8Ds. I have a weakness for 727s. :) And I like hearing the MD-88s blast off from RDU when I’m near the airport.

}:-)4


22 posted on 06/19/2007 9:15:03 AM PDT by Moose4 (Effing the ineffable since 1966.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Moose4

The JT8D-2xx are cheaper, and they require almost no modification of the aircraft. Supposedly the CFM-56 can interfere with the radar pattern of the AWACS, but the French, British, and Saudi air forces all fly AWACS with CFM-56 engines.


23 posted on 06/19/2007 9:17:23 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson