Nope. The proceeds of a fund of money that is immune from attachment at the initial point along its line of receipt is free from attachment at all points. Eg: the proceeds from the sale of a home that was homestead does not lose its protected status of being free from execution in those states, like Florida, where a person’ homestead is immune. The fund of money merely substitutes for the property.
Until such time as the funds are commingled, which would involve both quesions of fact and law. In any event, at this point the judgment debtor would have both the burden of going forward as well as the burden of persuasion.