[GodGunsGuts]

Here’s some more for you guys to chew on re: non-random mutation. Again, neo-Darwinism predicts the exact opposite. As I said before, IMHO it won’t be long before random mutation is overturned in favor of non-random/directed mutation (which of course will further vindicate ID/Creation Science):

http://www.iscid.org/papers/Borger_SharedMutations_061506.pdf

[narby]

So your Borger guy wants to completely overturn genetics. Ok. When does he get his Nobel prize? Scientists with an argument powerful enough to overturn established science always win the Nobel.

And it's not like science doesn't like such revolutions. In fact, they operate on disruptions in the status quo. If everything were known, science could close their lab doors and go home.

So when does your anti-Darwin campaigner get his Nobel?

[Youngblood]

Another revolutionary finding, up there with Behe’s Newtonesque discoveries! Strangely unpublishd as yet, although I’m sure one or two conspiracy-minded journals have turned it away. And strangely absent from any discussion outside of the ISCID forum that I can see. Is everyone afraid to take on Mr Borger’s findings?