[SolidWood]

I write this BS as what it is... a crack pot idea.

Anyone “having lots of babies”, just for increasing the number of his ethnicity/religion/group is IMO an heartless idiot.

Babies are something sacred. Couples not willing to raise their kids in love shouldn’t procreate.

Children are not a numerical mass for socialist ideas of population and de-population.
They are individual human beings, and should be treated with utmost respect from the very beginning.

[Schwaeky]

What America needs is a 21st century equivalent of the Lebensborn program, albeit without the racial charachteristics of the program in Germany... Ban abortion, encourage large families, get the women to stay at home (free up jobs for more men in the long term--other than traditional jobs for women)....

[sauron]

That's the way it should be, of course, and I do agree with you. In theory.

But look at the Muslims: Raising sons as warriors, and acquainting them with guns, weapons, and ashura (look it up). We're raising our sons in government schools that forbid contact sports, dodgeball, 1" plastic toy guns, drawings of guns in crayon, playing soccer without keeping score, and large doses of Ritalin.

They're also pumpin' out babies (seemingly, again, "ashura" festival rites) without care, even without apparent love.

And they're spreading, expanding, and we're retreating, entrenching.

It's obvious who's winning.

There's a time to fight. That quote from Churchill about how it may be necessary to fight even when there's no hope, etc., comes to mind.

A grim future for our great-great-grandchildren.

Sauron

[alexem]

Sense when is suggesting that having more children in light of the coming demographic cris a “crack-pot” idea?

I love his line about Ann Coulter—ya really, when is she going to find mister right? Any suggestions men?

[shekkian]

You mean we can’t have our cake and eat it, too?