Ed, I certainly agree that relying on your words is the most compelling way of describing your theory.
On December 9, 2001, you wrote:
View profile
More options Dec 9 2001, 7:09 pm
Debby,
Your comment that it was his ex-wife who reads the tabloids really got me to thinking, and I mentioned that comment on my web page at
http://extra.newsguy.com/~detect/anthrax.html
I don’t know how young the child is, but he/she would have to be young enough to not realize what was happening. It’s a really great theory. I’d been trying to figure out how he could get a kid to write the letters for him, and then your comment made it clear: he used his own kid! It’s probably just wild speculation, but it sure fits.
Thanks for the feedback. I really appreciate it.
Ed”
What is your point? That no one should ever learn anything new because it might cause them to change their mind about something or learn that what they said in the past may not have been entirely correct?