Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Another anti-Walmart screed which no doubt originated with a disgruntled union rep:

Wal-Mart, which said it canceled its policies in early 2000 because it was losing money on the arrangemen, says the program was intended to reduce its income taxes to help pay rising employee health care costs. Workers were notified and given the opportunity to opt out, the company said. Myers said this corporate practice is not uncommon. He estimates that up to 25 percent of Fortune 500 companies have taken out such policies on employees. The vast majority of the time, the employees didn't know, Myers said.

141 posted on 07/04/2007 6:54:42 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DouglasKC

The part that has me questioning Wal-Mart’s fair play here is the fact that they’ve been successfully sued over this. I’m not sure if it’s legit or they got an O.J. jury. To me, there’s a lot of unanswered questions.


147 posted on 07/04/2007 11:18:02 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Sharpei diem -- Seize the wrinkled dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson