[Scythian]

And this negatively impacted the employees how, exactly? I would take this to the supreme court. No company should be able to make a profit from the death of an employee. I would investigate walmart in relationship to every employee death as they have motive, period. That's my opinion folks, and you're going to have to live with it.

[Scythian]

Oops, I mean “That’s my opinion folks, and you’re going to have to live with it, that is, unless you’re a walmart employee, then you might wind up dead?”

[ishabibble]

You quite obviously don’t understand this subject at all.

[Gabz]

I would investigate walmart in relationship to every employee death as they have motive, period.

What an idiotic statement. Do you suggest the investigation into the deaths of every employee who works for a company with these policies, or is your veiled accusation only aimed at WalMart?

[Zon]

That's my opinion folks, and you're going to have to live with it.

No. You have to live with it. Anyone and everyone may chose to ignore you. You've made it easier for people to do that.

[AmericaUnited]

I would investigate walmart in relationship to every employee death as they have motive, period.

Yes, Walmart has been secretly 'whacking' employees to collect the life insurance money. TOTAL UNADULTERED KOOK GIBBERISH.

[vharlow]

There exists an “insurable interest” in the loss of a key employee to any company. It’s the law of insurance. There is a loss to the company when an employee long in service dies. The cost of recruiting and training new employees is not just some piddling thing. I couldn’t benefit from the death of Marilyn Monroe by purchasing a policy on her life, but I would definitely suffer a loss of services from a key employee dying. This must be a new concept to some leftist lawyers who know nothing about insurance law.

[Clam Digger]

What a cute, but thoroughly naive little opinion you have there.