To: Gabz
According to the article WalMart employees were notified and offeredd the opportunity to say no. Don't let facts get in the way of a good WalMart-bashing thread.
48 posted on
07/03/2007 9:06:28 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: dfwgator
Don't let facts get in the way of a good WalMart-bashing thread.
Cuz of course Wal-Mart is telling the truth. Except the lede of the story says that the lawsuit was filed because "Armatrout was one of about 350,000 employees Wal-Mart secretly insured nationwide." So we have Wal-Mart claiming employees were notified, and the lawyer claiming they weren't. Who you gonna believe, the scum lawyer suing Wal-Mart or the scum lawyers defending Wal-Mart? Here's a hint: Wal-Mart has already had to pay out $15 million from two lawsuits over this issue.
54 posted on
07/03/2007 9:11:46 AM PDT by
drjimmy
To: dfwgator
57 posted on
07/03/2007 9:14:14 AM PDT by
Gabz
(Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson