Posted on 07/05/2007 6:38:32 PM PDT by blam
Muslim group 'backing' Army attacks faces ban
By Philip Johnston, Home Affairs Editor
Last Updated: 2:13am BST 06/07/2007
A radical Muslim group was again threatened with a ban yesterday after one of its leaders defended terrorist attacks on British armed forces overseas.
Taji Mustapha, a spokesman for Hizb ut-Tahrir, pledged "support" for attacks on British soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"I will stand up and support the right of people whose land is occupied to defend themselves," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
Hizb ut-Tahrir (HT) was threatened with proscription by Tony Blair two years ago. The pledge was never carried out because police could not establish that it was a terrorist organisation. However, the law was changed last year to outlaw groups that ''glorify'' terrorism.
Harriet Harman, the Commons leader, yesterday said this law could be used against HT. "We must be very concerned that we don't have subversion and support for terrorism fomented in this country,'' she said.
HT has managed to avoid being banned even though its influence has been apparent for some time to jihadi watchers. It has waged an effective propaganda campaign to deny any responsibility for the increasing threat from Islamist terrorists.
HT's leaders claim to be nothing more, or less, than a proselytising organisation, spreading the word of Islam, much as evangelical Christians do.
They want to establish a caliphate - a unified Islamic government in the traditional Muslim world, which once stretched as far west as Spain and Portugal.
It also opposes the "neo-colonialist'' western control of the Islamic world, in which it includes Israel. In the Commons this week, David Cameron, the Tory leader, said the group fomented anti-semitism and advocated killing Jews.
Founded in 1953, Hizb ut-Tahrir claims to have "spread its message" to more than 40 countries and is estimated to have about one million members.
MI5 and the police were asked for evidence to justify banning it but were unable to provide any.
A report advised that HT did "not directly advocate violence. Indeed membership or sympathy with such an organisation does not in any way presuppose a move towards terrorism".
However, the report also said membership of groups such as Hizb ut-Tahrir ''may indicate... the possibility of a few of its members being open to gradual consideration of far more extremist doctrine".
HT has been active in British universities for 15 years or more. In one study, Anthony Glees, a professor at Brunel University's centre for intelligence and security studies, said its influence among students was important.
"Radicalism isn't the same as extremism which isn't the same as terrorism and the number of people who go from one to the other may be very small,'' he said.
''But it only takes a small number to kill a large number of innocent people, including Muslims.''
Ed Husain, a former HT member, whose book The Islamist exposed their methods, called it ''an extremist organisation", which ran a cell structure and indoctrinated its members.
Even though it is not a violent group, it is the ideological inspiration for those who would cause trouble.
HT is banned in most Muslim countries, rejected by most mosques in Britain, yet it still has a free rein on university and college campuses.
Julian Lewis, the shadow defence spokesman, said if its leaders were advocating attacks on British troops they should either be tried for treason in Britain or ejected from the country.
An HT spokesman said: ''We accept that our organisation causes the government considerable political and diplomatic discomfort, in that our campaigning against dictators in the Muslim world, many of whom are allies of the government, such as General Musharraf and Presidents Karimov and Mubarak, exposes its hypocrisy.
''But we completely reject the baseless accusation that our organisation calls for the killing of Jews.''
How do you ban a group like this? They’ll just change their name to something else. Surely it is against the law to promote attacks on your own military. For starters, it’s a hate crime to promote violence against an identifiable group, is it not? Actually this is treason but I guess in this day and age treason is no longer a politically correct accusation. Anyway, members should be charged and jailed or deported if found guilty. Banning the group is just a PR maneuver - makes it look like the gov’t is actually accomplishing something but doesn’t reduce the threat at all.
Why in the hell is Europe inviting these people to immigrate to their country?
What benefit does it provide?????
Which one of those three is Taji Mustapha? I can't tell them appart; their disguises are first rate!
I saw the muslin title and wondered if they were as bad as Lininites.
That's because the pictured is not a "Muslim" group, but a "Muslin" group.
Granted, I've no idea what a Muslin is, but maybe that's what they look like.
The pictured really is of a Muslin group, whad'ya know.
It’s not just Europe that’s been inviting these Islamic rats into their midst. If you haven’t noticed, the United States now has more Muslims than Jews... And that’s a trend that’s continuing.
Muslin is a type of material. Quite heavy. Often used for draperies, as well. ;)
Yeah, Edith Wharton novels!
Ban ‘em? They should shoot ‘em.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.