[balch3]

the title says it all.

[balch3]

I only meant to paste the first letter. The second is Darwinist garbage.

[Caipirabob]

I'm a firm believer in Evolution.

That it happened by God's design in God's time.

"Oi! You over there in the puddle with the 18 eyes and 36 legs...yes you! Stand upright, breath oxygen, walk over here and paint the 'Mona Lisa'!"

OK, not quite, but something along those lines. : )

[dread78645]

Over the last few years hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent in an attempt by scientists to find evidence for God's handy work in the natural world. They have even tried (unsuccessfully) to have intelligent design inserted into school science courses on the basis that both arguments deserve equall respect, even though Darwinian evolution has literally mountains of ancient evidence to back it up, and intelligent design has no evidence at all, ...

Good find. Tell it brother!

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

Mr. Farrell is a bit.....passionate in his viewpoint.

Being Creationist is not the same as being a flat Earther.

• It is obvious that the Earth is round (squashed sphere). Even before humans were able to go into space, this was shown via sound science with shadows at a particular time at two locations. Furthermore, on flat land, and especially on the ocean, looking around you to the horizon looks as though it's a circle. If 'horizon views' on flat land or water look as though they are circles, you could conclude that the Earth is a sphere (with people looking as far as they can until their view is tangent (or close to it--the Earth's mass bends the view a bit) with the sphere).
• Macroevolution on the other hand, is extremely far from proven, and sometimes they have to include very unsound science for their hypothesis to work. (i.e. this isn't technically Macroevolution, but long ageism. The universe is larger than it should be if the big bang happened when scientists believe it did and the energy and material expanded at the speed of light (roughly c if not c). This is explained by having space expand faster than the speed of light, which doesn't violate relativity. But space expanding faster than c hasn't been demonstrated, much less proven. It was practically conjured up from thin air simply to explain why the universe is as large as it is while being 'only' some 13 or so billion (American) years old.

[HighWheeler]

[raybbr]

God created Evolution!

[Tax-chick]

Ireland ping!

[Misterioso]

the title says it all.

LOL!

[theFIRMbss]

[gcruse]

“...nobody can ever find evidence for the non-existence of God. “

Incorporeal, absent, invisible, convenient, and fictional suffice for me.

[ex-snook]

It’s all about creation both universe and life. Evolution is but a subset to examine life.

The most rational universal explanation is that there is a creator and that the universe and its contents were created. What other explanation comes remotely close?

[FourtySeven]

Evolution is preposterous

Well, I'm convinced. I finally see the light! Yes, yes, it's clear: 1000's of scientists across the world are involved in a massive conspiracy to keep people from God and Jesus. Satanists all of them!!!!!! Bring back the firey stake!!!!!

< /sarc > (just in case it's not clear to some real thick skulls)

[RightWhale]

the false pseudo-scientific religion

Algore ought to hire this writer to put some additional hyperbole into his flaming Global Warming preposterousness.

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

Liberal sexual hangups are behind the hysteria for atheistic Darwinism. There are only a few things that get liberal secular humanists that worked up. They had to get rid of Christianity to pave the way for their Brave New World and they saw the Monkey Bones silliness as the way to do it.

No normal person spends that much time brooding over and inventing fantasy graphs of Homo Erectus and Homo Habilis apemen, having tantrums with anyone who disagrees with their agenda to impose such views. The whole cult of "primitive man" is the product of 19th-century Victorian abnormal sexual psychology. Take a look at pictures of the secular humanist nerds who dreamt it up and at their fantasy primitive apemen.

[upcountryhorseman]

Darwin himself stated that:” If no transitional animals
are found, his theory is not valid”.

[Sen Jack S. Fogbound]

“If God wrote it, the grammar must be infallible. Perhaps it is we who are mistaken.” -MapleLeaf

[raygun]

(Shaking head sadly) No it doesn't and the author of the article is a moron.

I need look no further than this statement:

One of the main reasons so many books by atheist writers have appeared recently is because of the "intelligent design" concept in the USA.

...walks away shaking head very sadly.

[hosepipe]

LIFE seems to have evolved eventually to humans who for the most part believe in a god(s) and if they don't have one they invent one.. or several.. According to Darwin humans evolved to believe in a god..

The mysterious fact remains..
Who were the parents of the third human on earth?..
Difference between fiction and reality is... fiction MUST SEEM logical..

[gondramB]

>>Evolution is preposterous<<

>>the title says it all.<<

I’m sure I’ll see plenty of disagreement as I read down the thread but I think scientists should acknowledge that evolution,like length contraction and time dilation etc is a truly outrageous concept and not at all intuitive for most people.

[Natural Law]

Why do so many denounce the concept of God using natural processes to introduce and perpetuate his living creations in a dynamic environment, but defend the use of natural processes of rain and flood in Noah story? Couldn’t God have just as easily used the same original process to recreate all life as in Genesis if that was the way He worked?