Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PlainOleAmerican
From the article (I like # 6 best)-

Let me see if I can remember all the reasons why we’re not supposed to support Fred Thompson for president… according to politicos across the political spectrum.

He’s too old (64)

He has cancer

He lacks political experience, or, he’s a Washington insider

He’s been both bachelor and family man, twice

He’s too conservative, or, not conservative enough

He likes pretty women, though not the same way Bill Clinton does

He’s too tough on abortion, but not tough enough for some

He’s a national security hawk, or, maybe a globalist dove

He’s a political nobody, or, a respected member of the Council on Foreign Relations

He was a Washington lobbyist, though by all accounts, an underpaid one

He’s just a TV prosecutor, or, a real prosecutor who often plays himself on TV

He was a Watergate Nixon insider, or, he was a leading Watergate prosecutor

Nixon thought he was a dunce, until the dunce forced Nixon to resign the Oval Office

He seems to imply that nobody knows the real Fred.

That may be the real question to be answered.

17 posted on 07/10/2007 8:15:24 AM PDT by airborne (COULTER: Actually, my favorite candidate is [Rep.] Duncan Hunter [R-CA], and he is magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: airborne

Clearly, as the writer points out quite well, the pundits don’t agree on who or what Fred Thompson is.

That could be because Fred has yet to announce his official platform, though indicators are not so hard to find.

It could also be because pundits are doing what pundits do, they are trying to frame Fred as they wish voters to see Fred, for benefit of their chosen candidates.

Fred will define Fred soon enough, I’m sure...

Until then, it’s all political rhetoric of no real value to anyone but the campaigns struggling to stay alive.

McCain just quit! and he had more money and more support than Hunter and Paul combined...

A long list of others will soon follow...


21 posted on 07/10/2007 8:31:27 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: airborne
He seems to imply that nobody knows the real Fred.

No, he's implying that the people who fear Thompson have no qualms about making contradictory claims, in their desperate search for any mud that will "stick".

39 posted on 07/10/2007 11:02:02 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Government is too important to leave up to the government" - Fred Dalton Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: airborne

You forgot “it’s rumoured he’s lazy”. That’s an important one.


41 posted on 07/10/2007 11:07:11 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: airborne
He seems to imply that nobody knows the real Fred.

That may be the real question to be answered.

I think what he's implying is that Fred opponents will always try to find some nonsense to use to attack Fred. If it's not one thing they can try to pin on him, then it'll be the opposite. Something has gotta work....

Which, of course, shows the desperation of the people who know Fred thrashes their chosen candidate.

49 posted on 07/11/2007 10:17:33 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson