Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Liberals Lie About Sex
Townhall.com ^ | July 15, 2007 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 07/15/2007 4:16:03 AM PDT by Kaslin

Liberals want your child to have sex. They want this to occur in spite of your religious, health, or parental objections. They are willing to substitute false thinking for solid fact on the consequences of what will happen. And they do so while simultaneously insulting you and your child's ability to comprehend, discern, and choose behaviors that make the most sense.

This week the teens of America sent a pretty solid message in response however - they don't want to.

For the first time since before President Clinton said what "is, is" a majority of American teens - 53% - have not had sex and are choosing to not do so. In Clinton's "hey days" the number was around 47%. But it would be hard to know this from just reading the headlines of the liberals' most important of allies, the mainstream media. Here's a sampling of some the outlets that commented on the survey that confirmed these amazing numbers:

CONDOM USE INCREASES AMONG TEENS - Chicago Tribune

SAFE SEX TEENS - New York Post

U.S. TEENS PRACTICING SAFER SEX - Ft. Worth Star Telegram.

BIRTHS TO UNWED MOTHERS INCREASE TO RECORD PROPORTION - Bloomberg

TEEN BIRTHRATE AT RECORD LOW, CONDOM USE INCREASES - Kaiser Network

Even outlets that did mention the reduced numbers of teens engaging in sexual activity nearly always also mentioned the increase in condom use.

Of course liberals need the story to be told this way. In April of this year liberals were out in full force making a complete mockery of our nation's youth population and their ability to say "no" when it comes to pre-marital sexual engagement. In that same month as study was released that had taken a small sample of 2000 kids from 1997 and followed them through high school. The kids selected were from four communities two rural, and two urban. The results of the study determined that abstinence education had almost no effect on the teens in the study.

As a result congressional liberals paraded up and down the halls of Capitol Hill giving press conferences stating the death of the abstinence education funding for the future. That simply because this study proved how "ineffective" these programs were proved the point that schools would need to revert back to the early 1990 style of sex ed. Of course it is easy to ascertain that the 1997 study focused on teens who were already teens in 1997 and who in large measure had no exposure to institutionalized abstinence education. These children of the "I did not have sex with that woman" era, were products of one of the most progressive and permissive sexual society's since the late 1960's.

The Bush Abstinence programs weren't implemented until the fall of 2001.

It is also important to point out that the study released this week examined far more than merely 2000 kids in 4 communities. The newest, far more expansive report surveyed 22 different federal agencies that tracked over 38 leading indicators. And it is very much worth pointing out that under the Bush Administration this is the sixth year in a row in terms of the drop of teen birth rates. Another stark contrast in recent history given that under the permissive Clinton regime the United States reached its all-time high in that regard.

It is odd to listen to Congressional liberals like Henry Waxman who regularly attempt to smear the Abstinence Education communities because of the certainty with which they pronounce abstinence's failure.

Yet even common sense tells us that the chances of incurring a teen pregnancy and then the possible tragic consequence of abortion, or the still very difficult consequence of a teen birth are affected by one's behavior. If a teen girl chooses to save sexual activity until she is married, she has zero chances of getting an STD, becoming pregnant, having an abortion, or out of wedlock birth. If a teen boy chooses to enhance his skills of communication, consideration, and leadership - instead of always trying to get in a girl's bed then he too avoids the heartbreak of STD's and responsibilities of pregnancy that he is not prepared for.

The truth is kids understand these simple concepts. And it is an insult to the teen's intelligence and nature to presume they don't. Faith based parents are pro-actively teaching their kids about the very simple reasons why sex before marriage will bring them confusion and destruction. Liberal parents do not, thus why they view all children as unable to control their drives any better than rabbits in the spring time.

The truth is we humans are capable of controlling every choice we make, and if we simply understood the natural outcomes of those choices perhaps we'd make better ones.

Perhaps the truth also includes the reality that as teens, liberals did not control their choices. Perhaps they did live their lives as animals copulating with anyone, and in people like President Clinton's case nearly everyone they ever had an eye for.

But this is not how it HAS to be.

And according to the most comprehensive study done to date - now more teenagers than ever before are deciding that they won't!

Kevin McCullough's first hardback title "The MuscleHead Revolution: Overturning Liberalism with Commonsense Thinking" is now available. Kevin McCullough is heard daily in New York City, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware on WMCA 570 at 2pm. He blogs at www.muscleheadrevolution.com.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: democrats; homosexualagenda; liberals; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
A woman I know who was a teenager in the 60's says that her high school and college teachers who were sexual liberals were also bedding students. (This was not my experience, but I have heard it from more than one source.)

Plus there's the research by Hofstra University's Charol Shakeshaft which ought to be more generally recognized: "The figures suggest that the physical sexual abuse of students in [public] schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."

The upshot is that in a sexually fast-and-loose society, attractive underage kids, both male and female, are far more available to be sexually exploited; or, to put it crudely, some liberals "want your child to have sex" - with them.

21 posted on 07/15/2007 12:37:28 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (A repugnant possibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TypeZoNegative
Also, the surface tension created by the moisture of the body and the condoms prevents the virus from leaking out.

I thought the anal canal didn't have a moisture barrier, psrt of the readon why condoms are less efective in anal interocurse.

22 posted on 07/15/2007 2:18:14 PM PDT by tuesday afternoon (htttp://thosewhocleave.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tuesday afternoon

Lubed condoms provide the moisture for you. Don’t ask me how I know this stuff.


23 posted on 07/15/2007 2:36:39 PM PDT by TypeZoNegative (Trinidad&Tobago: Proof that a Muslim minority (5%pop) causes a majority of a country's problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here’s why liberals promote sex: Our society has evolved into a type of market economy that depends upon a significant percentage of the population being single. Being single means you don’t make a lifelong significant commitment. You play the field. You start sexual activity at a young age, and spend most of your life pursuing sexual partners.

Single people spend their money on all the things that Madison Avenue promotes. Single people eat out more. They buy more airline tickets, charge stuff on their credit cards, and rack up those frequent flier miles. They buy more clothes, hair products, and cosmetics. They spend their free time, and a lot of their money, in the malls and at the movie complexes. They fund the plastic surgeons, divorce attorneys, and psychotherapists. The media in all it’s forms - film, television and print - trumpets this lifestyle. In many ways the single lifestyle is what drives our economy.

While married people may, and do, dabble in all these things from time to time, unless they are billionaires, long-time married people do not make these things the focus of their lives. They’ve figured out that it is cheaper, as well as more nutritious, to fix their own food at home as opposed to eating out. Instead of going to the movies and the malls several times a week, they stay home, mow the grass, run the vacuum cleaner, fix dinner, and do stuff with the kids and grandkids. Divorce attorneys, psychotherapists, personal trainers, image consultants, and plastic surgeons get few of their dollars. They don’t follow the tabloid press, and could care less what Paris, Brittney, and Lindsey are up to this week.

Forget the outdated notion that the Republicans are the party of big business. That’s not what drives our economy now. The modern Democratic Party is the mouthpiece of our current form of consumer-based, entertainment-driven capitalism, and the single person’s endless obsession with sex and sexual attractiveness is the spark plug for it all.


24 posted on 07/15/2007 4:58:11 PM PDT by Cookie123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cookie123

Good post...


25 posted on 07/15/2007 5:01:45 PM PDT by Zeon Cowboy (DUNCAN HUNTER for President - http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; wagglebee; All

Need a recommendation for a book to give an 11 year-old boy! Can anyone out there help?

I’ve been searching high and low at the bookstores and online. And every single “growing up” book for preteens includes graphic sexual content about things like oral sex and talks about homosexuality. And that’s not all. They’re like How-To manuals. Even a Christian book talks about oral and anal sex.

All I want is a book that talks about staying physically healthy, what physical changes to expect in the next couple of years, and the facts of life presented in a respectable way. Any recommendations?


26 posted on 07/16/2007 5:21:51 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes; metmom; Coleus; narses; NYer; xzins
Need a recommendation for a book to give an 11 year-old boy! Can anyone out there help?

I’ve been searching high and low at the bookstores and online. And every single “growing up” book for preteens includes graphic sexual content about things like oral sex and talks about homosexuality. And that’s not all. They’re like How-To manuals. Even a Christian book talks about oral and anal sex.

All I want is a book that talks about staying physically healthy, what physical changes to expect in the next couple of years, and the facts of life presented in a respectable way. Any recommendations?

I don't know of any, but I've pinged a few people who might be able to give you some suggestions.

I'm sure they're out there and I actually think that something that was printed 40 or 50 years ago would probably work just as well, it's not like our bodies have changed.

27 posted on 07/16/2007 5:32:22 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson