Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/19/2007 4:01:42 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: gpapa

Every time out they say brokered convention....then one candidate wraps it up earlier and earlier...


2 posted on 07/19/2007 4:12:45 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gpapa

A brokered Republican convention would inevitably produce a nominee who has a hard time unifying the party to the (great) extent this will be necessary. People have expected for a long time now that the nominee will be the “choice” of the party’s voters. The reason there won’t be a brokered convention, in either party, is that there aren’t sufficient ideological differences among the candidates to sustain a second- or third-place campaign after a few defeats at the beginning of ‘08. After the first few primaries, a front-runner will be clear and everyone else will fold. There is almost no opportunity anymore for a Reagan ‘76 scenario, where he resolves — against the advice of at least some advisors — to stay in the race. Indeed, RR said he’d stay in the race even if he lost every primary. That kind of political seriousness simply doesn’t exist anymore.


3 posted on 07/19/2007 4:12:49 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson