Don’t make an online fool of yourself like others in this thread.
Read the backstory.
Shame on the He’s for wanting to raise their OWN child.
/sarc
I preferred the courts of this country when a judge in an adoption case like this made his determination on the basis of what is in the best interest of the child; obviously you do not.
For the ignorant (albeit well-meaninged, I’m sure) people who’ve been on this thread, here’s the Reader’s Digest version of this story:
Baby was born.
Child’s parent(s) felt they were unable to adequately care for said baby, and baby was sent to live with the Bakers.
At some point, the Bakers had a conflict with the Hes, followed by a ruling by judge childers (rightly or wrongly) for the Hes to stay away from the Bakers, which the Hes complied with.
Because they COMPLIED to the order, they weren’t allowed to visit Anna for a period of time. Then, and only then, came the BOGUS abandonment charge.
Since then, the Hes have been trying to get THEIR child back, and if it weren’t for the Tennessee Supreme Court, they would never have been able to get THEIR child back.
The Hes have done the right thing top to bottom, period.
Idiots.
Penowa, you made a superb point. In situations like this one children are treated as “property” - much as slaves were prior to the Civil War.
Our judicial system is sick.