Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US offers F-35 fighters to India
NDTV ^ | Sunday, July 22, 2007 (New Delhi) | NDTV

Posted on 07/22/2007 10:55:16 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: Paul Ross

No point beating a dead horse. Iraq is a dead horse. BTW India was ready to send troops to Afghanistan. US refused.

Now THAT is what you can call “Mucho stupido” or in Espaniol “Mucho estúpido”.


61 posted on 07/23/2007 3:34:06 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
BTW India was ready to send troops to Afghanistan. US refused.

That is a somewhat different case. Afghanistan is linked at the hip to Pakistan which has the ongoing border region disputes, and correct me if this is not so, but shares its historical "muslim califate" antipathy to the primarily Hindu India...

Iraq, isn't lost yet, and as a non-neighboring state may not have as knee-jerk an opposition to India.

But you're right in general...we should not be looking gift horses in the mouth.

62 posted on 07/23/2007 4:09:44 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
BTW India was ready to send troops to Afghanistan. US refused.

That is a somewhat different case. Afghanistan is linked at the hip to Pakistan which has the ongoing border region disputes, and correct me if this is not so, but shares its historical "muslim califate" antipathy to the primarily Hindu India...

Iraq, isn't lost yet, and as a non-neighboring state may not have as knee-jerk an opposition to India.

But you're right in general...we should not be looking gift horses in the mouth.

63 posted on 07/23/2007 4:10:48 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick; TigerLikesRooster; Rokke; Pukin Dog

Outstanding!


64 posted on 07/23/2007 4:11:33 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
“but shares its historical “muslim califate” antipathy to the primarily Hindu India...”

No actually they dont. They like Indians and they curse Pakistanis. The curse them for unleashing the Taliban on them and love Indians because they are building the schools and hospitals and are involved in big time re-construction work. And they are all die hard fans of bollywood......even more then Indians. In the days of Taliban rule, they would smuggle Indian movies to watch risking their own lives. They are that much fan of “Hindustan”.

Too bad US choose Pakistan over India. Never change horses while crossing a stream.

65 posted on 07/23/2007 4:28:25 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia
Israel JSF
66 posted on 07/23/2007 4:51:40 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Umm,would the US send troops to fight terrorists in Jammu & Kashmir or in India’s North-East???Not a handful,but potentially,100s of thousands?????Chances are no-the same goes for any Indian intervention in foreign countries outside the UN(where combat operations are minimal).It’s only happened once before in Sri Lanka & didn’t pan out well.

India’s is doing more than it’s fair share against extremist Islam & no point securing other’s chances at being a nation state,when your own existence is being threatened.


67 posted on 07/23/2007 5:16:26 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; kinoxi
Did you see the freaking growth rate!?

In 1961, there were 47,000,000 Muslims in a population of 439,235,000 ( 10.7%). Today there are 138,190,000 out of 1,030,000,000 13.4% . That is basically a tripling of population in 50 years!

68 posted on 07/23/2007 7:35:38 PM PDT by rmlew (Build a wall, attrit the illegals, end the anchor babies, Americanize Immigrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Southack
A positive move. I have to wonder, though, if this would make China more cooperative with regard to N. Korean situation. Probably not.

If there is a big change in N. Korea, it is due to its internal problem such as succession struggle.

A long-predicted arc of Japan-Taiwan-Singapore-India is taking shape, with U.S. and Australia in the background.

69 posted on 07/23/2007 7:35:51 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
India’s is doing more than it’s fair share against extremist Islam & no point securing other’s chances at being a nation state,when your own existence is being threatened.

Fair points. But the existential threats aren't all home-grown. The Sri-Lanka expeditionary action is also a cautionary tale.

70 posted on 07/24/2007 5:37:14 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson