Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bender2

“I checked the original Northrop Grumman Press Release at http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=123187 and it says this and also mentions the B-2’s combat load is 40,000 pounds, so I wonder about the conflict this makes...

Yet I trust if anyone can figure out a way to put 60,000 pounds of whipass into a 40,000 pound sack, it would be Northrop Grumman!”

I’m pretty sure there were significant safety margins inherent in the B-2’s design. Still, these must be sphincter clenching changes for the pilots...heroes all.


57 posted on 07/26/2007 9:13:05 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: PreciousLiberty
Still, these must be sphincter clenching changes for the pilots...heroes all.

My dad was a SeaBee in the Pacific in WWII and told me the planes were so heavily loaded down with bombs that at the end of the runways you would see tail sections pointing up at the end of the runways more than a few times. They really pushed the envelope, that's how they won.

Nam Vet

66 posted on 07/26/2007 10:49:31 PM PDT by Nam Vet (Timely reporting from Attila's right flank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson