“This is why the dems have told Bush that he will have to re-negotiate the pending FTAs with Peru, Columbia, Panama, and S. Korea to include regulatory protections for the unions, the environment, and social justice.”
That’s certainly interesting speculation on your part - the rats don’t want international scumbag bureaucrats writing illegal law because the rats want to protect federal bureaucrat sumbags illegally writing law.
If you can provide any links to your speculation, I’d be most interested in reading it.
I find the whole matter of bureaucrats illegally writing law an affront to our right to vote, via the ballot box, for representatives to write law. In fact, I consider bureaucrats writing law to be a crime of sedition, and judges and legislators who allow it need to suffer the most severe punishment allowed by law.
While this is typical radical Schumer, the undercurrent of the article is the foreshadow aspect of it...
He’s worried about Justice Stevens.
Three words Senator:
Janice Rogers Brown
It would take years to build a huge ground swell of support but the only way to deal with this morass of
bureaucratic crap that Washington has become is to have
a third constitutional convention with everything of the old order completely pitched out and rewritten. Everything
starts clean with historical lessons learned and relearned!
I suspect it will take another civil war to achieve it. The hillarites won’t go away quietly!
I’m not sure what you are asking me for. This is a very broad subject.