The bridge collapse is not terrorism because...
1) Keith Ellison is a Congressman from that city.
2) The 6 Imams who caused a ruckus onboard a flight that originated from Minn.-St. Paul.
3) The cabdrivers who refuse to take passengers who have liquor and/or who are accompanied by seeing-eye dogs.
4) The Muslims who created a ruckus when a college institution would not allow Muslim-only prayer areas, but rather an all-denomination prayer area. The Muslims are appealing the decision and it appears that they will get what they want.
5) The fact that CAIR has the largest presence of members in Minn.-St. Paul, outside of the DC area.
6) The fact that Minn.-St. Paul is so liberal, that it might as well be Vladivostok.
MY PRAYERS TO ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THIS AWFUL ACCIDENT.
It would be extremely hard for a team of military sapper engineers to bring down that bridge. They would have to have multiple charges placed at precise points. It would be a huge undertaking, AND it would leave an obvious explosives footprint.
If I had access to an independent team of explosives inspectors, I’d get them there to find out if there are signs.
One guy I heard on the news said that the bridge dropped in a matter of seconds. The info-babe on Fox & Friends was talking about how awfully hot the summer’s been in Minneapolis (as if hot weather drops bridges), so if she can postulate something that odd, then I can certainly say we should get independent explosives experts on the scene immediately.
Why?
Because there MIGHT BE powers that would want to suppress acknowledgement of terrorist activity.