Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
I tend to agree. Not a high profile target that a large, organized, group would go after. No claim of credit that a smaller “mom & pop” operation would be releasing to gain notoriety. Though it might be wise to consider a disgruntled construction worker or DoT employee trying to make a point and succeeding beyond his/her wildest dreams.
1,868 posted on 08/02/2007 6:30:17 AM PDT by brothers4thID (FDT: "Every notice that while our problems are getting bigger, our politicians are getting smaller?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1864 | View Replies ]


To: brothers4thID; xzins

I am not an engineer, but I am in large scale commercial construction and I’m familiar with structural steel and concrete. There is a lot more to this than just slapping on some explosives like they show in the movies. This bridge DROPPED, amateur explosives would have blown OUT. The piles look untouched (which is the first place an amateur would have placed explosives). And NOBODY reported any odor from explosives.

Could terrorists have done this? YES. However, they would have needed demolition experts, structural engineers and original plans for the bridge. With this level of expertise, it would have made more sense to destroy an office building full of people.


1,884 posted on 08/02/2007 6:40:20 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1868 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson