Yes, times have certainly changed. My parents were born in 1900 (Dad) and 1911 (Mom), each into large families. I had 20 sets of aunts and uncles (most passed on now) and approximately 90 first cousins. That kind of growth in population, useful in a rural, farming community, could not be sustained now, but I would never fault anyone for having more than 2.4 children as long as they can support and educate them.
Sure, my family were all farmers, and needed a lot of extra help. The kids went to work as soon as they could walk. I think that’s one of the problems we have today— kids running around with no jobs. (those pesky child-labor laws) ha ha
Here in California, I see plenty of people with huge families who don’t look like they can afford it, but hey, why worry if you’re getting “assistance”? (my family -like yours I’m sure- never had any assistance. )ha