To: Scotsman will be Free
Got him convicted already on the basis of a news story, eh? Hope they dont pick you for the jury.
No. I didnt say that. Ive served on several juries over the years and I followed the judges instructions to stay impartial and only take into consideration the rule of law and the evidence presented during the trial. I havent convicted him on anything. Im only expressing an opinion as just an average shmuck and not as a juror. However the only evidence presented so far is from the news story so thats all I have to go by. If further evidence presents its self, Im entitled to and might very well form a different opinion. If she physically attacked him, that might be a different story or if he didnt lay a hand on her and shes just making a case out of whole cloth, thats another thing completely.
With that being said however, what if my next door neighbor is a cop and he lets his dog poop in my yard without cleaning it up and after asking him nicely several times to stop letting his dog poop in my yard, I get angry and have a verbal confrontation with him?
Say I call him a pig and then he pummels me in the face and breaks my jaw? If hes just a neighbor, I have a legal case against him. If hes a cop I also have some justification to say hes not fit to be a cop. Do you not agree?
45 posted on
08/05/2007 2:36:45 PM PDT by
Caramelgal
(Rely on the spirit and meaning of the teachings, not on the words or superficial interpretations)
To: Caramelgal
What does that have to do with you already convicting the cop in the news article? Zip.
47 posted on
08/05/2007 3:25:25 PM PDT by
Scotsman will be Free
(11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
To: Caramelgal
I think “anger management problems” was a good call, based on the other news sources we’ve seen.
51 posted on
08/05/2007 4:14:15 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(All the main characters die, and then the Prince of Norway delivers the Epilogue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson