Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield

Hmmm....over 4 rounds a second is inadequate?

Seems to me like a good idea. If you aren’t hitting it with 4.3 rounds/second, you just aren’t hitting it. And if you are, wouldn’t that be enough?


9 posted on 08/06/2007 6:12:32 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Yes, it is inadequate. Often one has only a snapshot for a second or two at most, and frequently at range, as in up to 1000 yards away. Half the bullets fired in the brief time window when an enemy is exposed means half the likelihood of hitting, pretty nearly. Halving the ROF is not acceptable. (If the gunner wants it, he just uses short bursts).
19 posted on 08/06/2007 6:26:28 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Seems to me like a good idea. If you aren’t hitting it with 4.3 rounds/second, you just aren’t hitting it. And if you are, wouldn’t that be enough? Fine for the anti-material role or other discrete target situation. But the M-2 is often used , perhaps most often, for the area suppression role. For that you want lots of metal downrange, fast.
41 posted on 08/06/2007 8:23:20 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
over 4 rounds a second is inadequate?

As heavy machine guns go, the 550 rpm of the M-2 is considered slow, half that would be glacial. Remember these things are often mounted on vehicles, to be used for suppressive fire, anti-material fire (against light skinned vehicles, like Jihadi car or truck bombs) and even in an anti-aircraft role. In the area suppression role, they are fired in a very short burst, traversed, fired again, and repeat as needed to cover the area of responsiblity.

They were once used as defensive armament for the B-17, B-24, B-29 and even the B-52, in a quad mount in the tail on all but the -H models. They also armed most US fighter aircraft up through the Korean war. The F-86, some models anyway, had 6 of 'em in the nose, to get a high enough rate of fire. (i.e. 3,300 rpm, still only about 1/2 that of the M-61 Vulcan which replaced the M-2 in both the -H model BUFF and many fighters, including today's F-22 and F-35. Although of course the M-2 doesn't throw explosive rounds.

45 posted on 08/06/2007 8:44:43 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

“...Hmmm....over 4 rounds a second is inadequate?

Seems to me like a good idea. If you aren’t hitting it with 4.3 rounds/second, you just aren’t hitting it. And if you are, wouldn’t that be enough?...”

Probably is enough for stationary targets. M2 gets used in the anti-aircraft role occasionally, though, and anyone trying to shoot down a jet or helo wants all the rounds he can spit.


57 posted on 08/07/2007 4:03:32 AM PDT by Renfield (How come there aren't any football teams with pink uniforms?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson