Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
The biggest problem I see from all this is that Mitt comes across as a candidate who will say whatever he thinks necessary to win an election.

So, then, which of his recent conservative ephipanies are heartfelt, and which are opportunistic? Recall that not long ago, he was supportive of the legislative direction of McCain-Kennedy. Is his conversion to anti-illegal-immigration real? Or will he try to revert back to Bush-Graham-McCain form once he no longer needs the votes of the right?

2 posted on 08/09/2007 8:14:05 AM PDT by dirtboy (Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Mitt has rightfully been called, not a "middle-of-the-road" politician, but a "cover-the-road" politician.

Which is why, at some point, he must end up here:


4 posted on 08/09/2007 8:16:48 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson