Posted on 08/31/2007 5:28:19 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
Were I, I'd support Ron Paul
Don’t know what Air America thinks, if they consider the CCC a racist organization, they’re right. I agree with them.
I think non-Christians should be allowed to serve in public office, and that requiring government and public leaders at all levels must reflect Christian beliefs and values . That’s a religious test, though I’m sure some “true conservatives”. The United States is a European country and that Americans are part of the European people. I don’t want to be part of the “European People”, code for northern European/Nordic. If you do, move to France.
If the CCC are your kind of people, or Paul’s, that’s your choice. But they’re racists and shouldn’t be associated with the Republican Party. They would agree on that.
I can't identify him…ROFL!...Another hit to your credibility!
You mean the fellow who wrote
"Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action,"Paul wrote.Paul continued that politically sensible blacks are outnumbered "as decent people." Citing reports that 85 percent of all black men in the District of Columbia are arrested, Paul wrote:
"Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal," Paul said.
Paul also wrote that although "we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers."
Not enough yet? How about Paul's suggestion that the age of adulthood for criminal prosecution be lowered -- for blacks?
He added, "We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."
No, I can’t identify him. Because Ron Paul, who was listed as the author, didn’t identify him.
Willis Carto, a prominent neonazi Holocaust denier, advertises Ron Paul as a columnist in his print publication….Ron Paul is not a columnist in his publication or any other publication.
Uhh, Willis would say different. The media guide for the American Free Press clearly advertises Ron Paul as a columnist to readers and advertisers.
An indicted drug dealer is organizing "meet-ups" for him in Canada….The "drug dealer" runs a legal business in Canada. He sells hemp seeds. You call a legal business in Canada a drug dealer? Just more drug war nonsense.
No, I call a an American under indictment in Seattle on drug charges a fugitive drug dealer. Most people do. Most politicians would turn down his support.
In my view a political candidate needs to disassociate himself from support like this….You have insinuated that Ron Paul is a Nazi sympathizer because some Nazis support him.
No I haven’t, I’ve said he appears to be tolerant of white supremacists, racists and conspiracy nuts.
Lets kick it up a notch….Are all Republicans and all Christians Nazi sympathizers?...StormFront is a neo-nazi website. They are Republicans. They are Christians. They support any Republican who promises to end the brown skinned invasion. They support Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo and good old Pat Buchanan. They oppose Liberals, Jews, Blacks, Browns, Asians, Atheists and all religions other than Christianity. Using your logic, all Republicans and all Christians are Nazis!
Are you really that stupid.
Christians condemn neonazis every day on this forum. Republican’s have rejected support from this element. Pat Buchanan, who hangs with these folk as well, isn’t a Republican. Ronald Reagan and Bush I specifically denounced support from David Duke (Buchanan was OK with it).
Unlike the Republican Party, Ron Paul does not reject support from that quarter. That’s the problem. Were he a viable candidate, the Republican Party would get the blame.
Why are you Swift-Boating a Republican?
Interesting how you phrase that, Swift-Boating as a pejorative. I like what they did so I don’t mind the comparison. .
Maybe, but so much else changed on 9/11 that it's hard to say that it was just Paul who did.
A Republican could question interventions in Somalia or Haiti or Bosnia or Kosovo without attracting much attention. Opposition to the Iraq War might get someone like Paul labeled "rabid" simply for following the same policy as before.
Ron Paul is a kook. But so far as I can find out he did support our involvement in Afghanistan (after 9/11), so that makes Eric's testimony suspect.
Seig Heil radioman!
Honestly, the dumbasses Ron Paul attracts are amazing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.