Skip to comments.
Papers Please: Arrested At Circuit City (Donations welcome, the ACLU will get most of it)
MichaelRighi.com ^
| September 2nd, 2007
| Michael Righi,
Posted on 09/03/2007 3:19:20 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-555 next last
In short, he refused to let Circuit City look in his bag, and then later arrested for not showing a license (he was not driving), which was changed to arrested for impeding the job of a cop that he himself called because he was being unlawfully detained by the manager (a criminal misdemeanor).
I'm going to keep a close eye on this case.
To: antiRepublicrat
Being practically a card carrying ACLU member I’m sure you will.
To: antiRepublicrat
You don’t know the number of times I have been enraged at having my receipt checked. I will be watching this as well.
To: antiRepublicrat
I'm not sure if this would be the hill I am willing to die on to defend my rights and liberty.
To each is own.
4
posted on
09/03/2007 3:25:05 PM PDT
by
Popman
(Nothing + Time + Chance = The Universe ---------------------Bridge in Brooklyn for sell - Cheap)
To: antiRepublicrat
This story is bogus. Digg.com had a similar one last month. Go ahead and contribute to his paypal fund if you believe him.
5
posted on
09/03/2007 3:25:24 PM PDT
by
OCC
To: antiRepublicrat
You cannot leave Fry’s without a bag check either.
6
posted on
09/03/2007 3:25:59 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: antiRepublicrat
I don’t care if the law is a little fault, this dude is an ass and deserves what he gets.
7
posted on
09/03/2007 3:26:05 PM PDT
by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: antiRepublicrat
The guy is a real jerk. What’s the big deal about letting them see you’re not stealing some high priced gadget? How does that infringe on his “rights?”
Perhaps the store has had a rash of shoplifting and they are taking proactive measures to ensure they aren’t getting ripped off? Can you blame them?
I’m with the store on this one. Call it another example of our declining society... the store has the right to protect itself from loss.
8
posted on
09/03/2007 3:27:43 PM PDT
by
teledude
To: antiRepublicrat
I think I’m hearing the faint echo of a recently slapped-down troll, but I’m not sure...
To: antiRepublicrat
Why would that guy called the ACLU in the first place?
10
posted on
09/03/2007 3:30:13 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Alright, hold tight, I'm a highway staaaaaaaaaaaaarrr)
To: antiRepublicrat
OK, I’ll bite. Just what in hell is wrong with them checking your receipt and/or looking in your bag?
.........and please, no yada, yada, yada, answers.
11
posted on
09/03/2007 3:30:21 PM PDT
by
Chuck54
To: edcoil
“”You cannot leave Frys without a bag check either.””
I have never let Fry’s check my bags, I don’t go that way, and have never run into a problem.
12
posted on
09/03/2007 3:30:54 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(First, cut off them off from jobs, benefits and other fruits of our society, Feed attrition.)
To: antiRepublicrat
13
posted on
09/03/2007 3:31:35 PM PDT
by
Illuminatas
(Being conservative means never having to say; "Don't you dare question my patriotism")
To: edcoil
14
posted on
09/03/2007 3:32:01 PM PDT
by
silentreignofheroes
(When the Last Two Prophets are taken, there will be no Tommorrow!)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: antiRepublicrat
Too bad he has chosen to get into bed with the ACLU on this and to donate any excess donations to them.
16
posted on
09/03/2007 3:32:52 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(Today there are 10,000 more illegal aliens in yer country than there were yesterday. 10,000! THINK!)
To: teledude
GOL DANG IT!!! MY DADDY FOUGHT THE GOLDANG RED JAPANESE SO I WOULDN’T HAVE TO SHOW MY BAG WHEN I LEAVE THE STORE!! THIS IS LIKE SOVIET GERMANY ALL OVER AGAIN!!!`
17
posted on
09/03/2007 3:32:58 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: teledude
I found the detail on Ohios stop and identify law. I encourage you to read it in its entirety, but I will spell out the important part:
2921.29 (C) Nothing in this section requires a person to answer any questions beyond that persons name, address, or date of birth. Nothing in this section authorizes a law enforcement officer to arrest a person for not providing any information beyond that persons name, address, or date of birth or for refusing to describe the offense observed.
18
posted on
09/03/2007 3:33:19 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: OCC
I remember reading something similar about a year ago.
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-555 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson