I’d ask some of you to read that statement again, in context, and see if you don’t agree with that analysis.
In short- he’s saying that the truthers can nitpick the report all they want on the details but the report is still true..
Let me know what you think after rereading it, please.
Agreed. The very notion of writing down a summary of what happened will inevitably leave something out, and may expose natural human confusion.
What part of
BIG PLANE + TALL BUILDING = BIG MESS + MANY DEAD
do people not understand?
But the evidence suggests that Bush was simply careless and unconcerned about the possibility of a terrorist attack.
Little Emo just equated GWB with William the Impeached and his ostritch policy of the Gay Nineties.
I came away thinking that it seemed possible to "prove" anything by making a reasonably impressive video. Thank God Hitler didn't have television to play with.
No, but Adolph had Leni Riefenshtal and her motion picture cameras handy at the Nuremberg Rally - showing Little Emo is that ignorant of history.
But I don't think the 9/11 Truth movement is driven primarily by an interest in finding out the truth. It is driven, instead, by a dangerous and unsettling fear of government.
No, it is driven by a political movement who are using these pathetic kids as useful idiots, to propel themselves back into power. Little Emo is but one among the ranks of these.
For that matter, little separates the movement from the tactics of Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who also exploited ordinary people's fear of their government by telling them that it was stocked with Communist traitors.
McCarthy, it turns out, was right all along.
Thsi kid is a useful idiot, and will never reform.