Posted on 09/11/2007 5:22:17 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
Hunter 2008!
2. Regarding the swift boats: http://www.billoreilly.com/column?pid=18730
3. Regarding illegal aliens, something (whatever that something is) has to be done — it’s the fault of our government that this was allowed to happen for decades.
Like I said, “common sense,” and facts, not just blind partisanship ranting. :-)
2. I heard him w/ my own ears say the "Swift Boat Vets had no right to be heard". Whatever garbage he's posted since cannot erase that.
3. You'll likely not find many who don't or won't agree the ILLEGAL alien debacle is the fault of our government. That does not, however, mean we should take the liberal bush/mccain/kennedy approach and grant them amnesty. Would you allow someone who has stolen your car to keep it simply because they have had it for a while? I seriously doubt it. So why take that approach with ILLEGALS?
4. You've not addressed a single fact yet. You've attempted and failed to defend a man who lied about this site, tried to silence American vets and who wanted to give amnesty to millions of ILLEGAL invaders. There's no "common sense" in that at all.
I have addressed every fact. I’m sorry it does not meet your standards. People on FR posted that they hate BOR. All BOR said was that people on FR hate him. He never said it was a hate site and, in fact, was careful not to do that. I’m sorry you refuse to see the facts and just believe what you want to. BOR is on our side — take a look at all he has done for the public. Open your eyes and ears. :-)
A little about your boy.
BOR compares FR w/ what he calls a "hate site" Daily KOS.
BOR's record of humilating women
You've claimed I am a partisan. I'm not the one with GOP in my name. Nor am I a member of the GOP. I'm an Independent. It's not 'partisan' to disapprove of the way O'Reilly advocates amnesty for ILLEGALS. It's not 'partisan' to think he stepped well over the line when he said the SBVs had no right to be heard.
BTW...I don't recall seeing any posts from you in this thread. If you feel he's "on our side", why weren't you there defending him? Did you and I just missed it?
I saw that show LIVE and, in fact, Kristinn and I were e-mailing each other back and forth shortly after that interview. I wrote to Kristinn that I have been around FR since 1998 and expressed my concern about the discourse deteriorating. A lot of my favorite posters got so disgusted with it that they left, and I really miss them. I feel that the discourse has improved since that interview. I think it opened up some people’s eyes and hearts. Like I said, BOR never called FR a hate site and was very careful not to do that. The people who have posted inapproprite things brought it upon themselves.
And you failed to respond to my query as to why you did not defend him in that thread. Nor did you address his sexual harrassment of a subordinate. What a guy.
Like I said, he may be on your side but he's not on the side of conservatives. He's a ratings whore bent on doing whatever he must to maintain his ratings.
So if you knew about the show and 'saw it LIVE', surely you must have chimed in that thread to defend him. If not why not and why defend him now?
You’re just harping at me. It doesn’t matter why I didn’t join in that particular post or any other post or why I’m posting what I’m posting now, nor does it matter what I think of the lawsuit BOR was involved in. The point is, one last time, BOR did not call FR a “hate” site and was very careful not to.
And his calling FR a hate site is only a fraction of the evidence that he is not on 'our' side. I know he's not on mine, nor is he on the side of conservatives at this site.
Ask yourself; how would you fell about him had he done this to you, your mother or your daughter?
“You’ve failed.”
And I suppose you didn’t? Check your attitude at the door.
And I couldn't help but notice you managed to avoid answering my question. How would you feel about your boy if he had sexually harrassed you or your daughter? Is turning a blind eye to such sleaze the right thing to do simply because it was not? Tough questions, huh?
Have a nice day.
Like, I said, check your attitude at the door, please.
Like I said, I don’t have one...I’m just pointing out the obvious.
And as long as you avoid answering that question you prove me right.
The only thing it proves is that I don’t care to discuss it — nothing more. Check your attitude at the door, again, please. Or did BOR tell you it was true or maybe you were a witness? You know without a doubt it is 100% true. Next time, I need to know something, I’ll ask you instead of “going to the source.”
Again, there were witnesses to what BOR did to this woman, which was no doubt one of the reasons he was willing to pay millions to make it go away.
And you've avoided answering my simple question for the third time now. That speaks volumes, and says to me you would rather hide from the truth than face it. So be it.
Have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.