Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhombus
This means he'd accept a certain number of American deaths as a "collateral damage" trade off for the maintenance of civil liberties.

And the stupid thing is, not a single person defending him could name a tangible "civil liberty" that we've "lost" as part of that supposed trade-off in the first place.

These people have the luxury of whining about fantasies because, let's face it, their lives are nice and comfortable.

I defy any Ron Paul supporter to explain how their lives have been changed one iota by the "lost civil liberties" they feign such outrage over.

223 posted on 09/23/2007 6:37:00 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Frank fan

Look at the Napolitano “Civil Liberties in Wartime” speech to the Future of Freedom Foundation this year. He spells it out in great detail. Be patient, and be prepared to be disturbed.


224 posted on 09/23/2007 6:40:15 PM PDT by Old 300 (Oligarchy or Republic: which shall it be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson