Who cares? This is not an issue of whether the reasoning behind execution of the right is reasonable to you or me, just that it is lawfully executed. If I don't want you on my property because your shoelaces are frayed, I don't want you on my property.
Actually, the two rights co-exist quite well, as your visitors who carry - contribute to protecting your property from criminals.
Of course they co-exist, but your rights do not superceed my right to prevent you access to my property. If I do not want your protection, you can not force it on me...
Again, I am amazed at how many conservatives are only interested in property rights when the owners of the property want to protect conservative interests.
Again, I am amazed at how many conservatives are only interested in property rights when the owners of the property want to protect conservative interests.
***And I am amazed at how many absolutists there are who conveniently overlook the constitution, and that the constitution was in effect before any employer had property rights over a given piece of land.
It is the public policy of the United States that our right to carry arms shall not be infringed.
Private property owners who prohibit concealed carry of arms by their invited visitors and/or business associates are, in effect, thumbing their nose at one of the Constitutions primary principles.
The Brady bunch types want everyone in the USA to believe; - that property rights trump our right to carry arms.
Actually, the two rights co-exist quite well, as your visitors who carry - contribute to protecting your property from criminals.
I am amazed at how many conservatives are only interested in property rights when the owners of the property want to protect conservative interests.
Why do you say it is "protecting conservative interests" to ban concealed carry on your property?