[dpa5923]

Do not take up law as a profession. Your lack of understanding of basic principles of constitution or common law is almost criminal. It would definitely be grounds for malpractice if you ever tried to present such flawed arguments in a court of law.

Before I call this issue dead, I feel I must address this though...

You invited me on your property to do business. My concealed weapon does not make me a trespasser.

If I invite you on my property with the stipulation that you must not be armed and you are indeed armed without my consent, then you have entered my property without my consent (my consent was conditional on you not being armed) and you would be a trespasser.

If I make no mention of such a condition you would not be trespassing until I tell you that you cannot be on my land with weapons and you refused to leave.

That's the law (which does not contradict the US Constitution)

[Kevmo]

You are not answering the questions put forth to you.

If you were a lawyer, a judge would fry your butt so bad, you wouldn’t be able to spit right.

Answer the questions. Otherwise I’m done dancing around with just another absolutist philosopher in love with hyperbole.

[Kevmo]

To be fair, the contention that I’m most interested in was not phrased in the form of a question, so here it is, reformulated:

If you want to put up a sign at the front of your business that says, “you no longer have constitutional rights when you cross this line”, your business will be shut down pretty fast. Does that mean your business had that right? Does your business have the right to establish slavery in light of the 14th amendment?