[Beagle8U]

I wonder if this same liberal twit judge would rule that employers could require that employees have no guns in their homes either?

My guess he could twist logic to fit that as well!

[NCLaw441]

You posted: I wonder if this same liberal twit judge would rule that employers could require that employees have no guns in their homes either?
***

Could you refuse to work for an employer who didn’t keep a gun in his home? Or would that be illegal? Could you refuse to work for an employer who DID keep a gun in his home? Or would THAT be illegal? I think it is perfectly legal to make that decision as an employee. Why, then, should an employer not be allowed to make the same decision? This also applies to smoking, drinking, bad language, playing frisbee or any other behavior. If it is important to either the employer or employee, each may base employment decisions on that issue. Freedom is a great thing when WE want to practice it, but sometimes less great when others want to do the same.

[mtbopfuyn]

Our “one time previous” doctor started questioning the kids one their first visit if we had guns in the house... see begining of sentence.

[Copernicus]

I wonder if this same liberal twit judge would rule that employers could require that employees have no guns in their homes either? My guess he could twist logic to fit that as well!

Too late, that train of logic is already underway with smoking and health benefit premiums.

If firearms become the public health hazard the Clintigula Administration tried to make them, the employer can make it a condition of employment not to own any.

Welcome to the future.

Best regards,

[Crim]

Hmmm...having all those guns in a court room isnt very safe either...

[Freedom4US]

As long as we have a logic exercise here, the employer might also require that the employees are well armed at work and in the home.