sheesh.........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: Sub-Driver
If it is for the Nobel, he is going to have a long wait!!
************
Since 1901, the Nobel Prizes have been presented to the Laureates at ceremonies on 10 December, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel’s death.
To: Sub-Driver
Pardon me while I lose my lunch. This is so bogus I cannot discuss it.
To: Sub-Driver
"Quick, Al! Come here and hold this bag!"
85 posted on
10/11/2007 12:03:06 PM PDT by
Blogatron
(I pitty the devil when hippies start arriving in bunches.)
To: Sub-Driver
I see Rush was off today, also ... perhaps they're the two finalists.
Really, knowing that Jimmy Carter got one is all you ever need to know about the Nobel Prize.
90 posted on
10/11/2007 12:34:54 PM PDT by
Sooth2222
("We have met the enemy and he is us." -Pogo)
To: Sub-Driver
Junky Industrial Waste Puke Alert!
92 posted on
10/11/2007 12:36:27 PM PDT by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; Seadog Bytes; FARS; Sub-Driver
sheesh......... Is right!!
94 posted on
10/11/2007 12:48:57 PM PDT by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
To: Sub-Driver
Ut-oh!!
There must have been another ManBearPig siting!!
97 posted on
10/11/2007 1:02:16 PM PDT by
KosmicKitty
(WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
To: Sub-Driver
Ignorant speculation. At this point the committee simply calls you. Award ceremony isn’t until December, so there would be NO reason for Gore to be flying anywhere.
To: Sub-Driver
108 posted on
10/11/2007 2:15:23 PM PDT by
smonk
To: Sub-Driver
Al Gore may be receiving the foremost liberal prize for failure; he is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Interestingly, his failures pail in comparison to the 2002 Peace Prize recipient Jimmy Carter, but not for lack of “effort.” Jimmy Carter is widely held to be the worst president of the 20th Century. Both are now equally irrelevant, though.
Under the best case scenario Gore wins and confirms how utterly preposterous each prize it is. But, more likely for the Clintoons to once again slight Gore in favor of a later Peace Prize to Hillary Clintoon. Not deminished by the useful idiot Al Gore.
BTW, the Jimmy Carter Prize reads: “for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development”
You can both “effort” and “advance” forever without any success, a niche that only laudable for a Democrap and Liberal. And, the stock and trade of socialists.
109 posted on
10/11/2007 2:23:38 PM PDT by
Fitzy_888
("ownership society")
To: Beowulf
To: texianyankee; JayB; markman46; palmer; Bahbah; Paradox; FOG724; Mike Darancette; GreenFreeper; ...
115 posted on
10/11/2007 6:34:54 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
To: Sub-Driver
Yet another reason to completely disregard the Nobel Propaganda .. err, Peace, Prize.
117 posted on
10/11/2007 6:54:33 PM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("No one asked you your opinion, Christopher." - Fred Thompson)
To: Sub-Driver
Returning to his home planet?
118 posted on
10/11/2007 6:57:09 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich!)
To: Sub-Driver
Mother Teresa was quoted as saying if she could give her Nobel Peace prize to anyone, it would be to the Devil himself.
To: Sub-Driver
129 posted on
10/12/2007 6:21:35 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
