To: Fudd Fan
The point Rush is making that liberals care only for good intentions and the right feelings, not results, is a problem that would be solved if women lost the privilege of voting. FReeper women vote correctly, of course, but the majority does not.
Personally I'd give up the privilege willingly if meant no other women could vote. The percentage of democrats elected in this country would, I believe, promptly drop to the single digits.
95 posted on
10/17/2007 10:42:33 AM PDT by
American Quilter
(The urge to save humanity is nearly always a cover for the urge to rule. - H. L. Mencken)
To: American Quilter
Oops, sorry for the double post!
97 posted on
10/17/2007 10:43:56 AM PDT by
American Quilter
(The urge to save humanity is nearly always a cover for the urge to rule. - H. L. Mencken)
To: American Quilter
Ann Coulter has said that, but I’m not convinced. I know enough male-types that buy the liberal lines and I would never entrust my future to them either. Everyone has a theory, but I don’t see it as a gender issue, it’s more a person’s worldview.
98 posted on
10/17/2007 10:44:35 AM PDT by
Fudd Fan
(hillery-rotten & her flying-monkeys in 08? OVER MY DEAD BODY, WitCh™!!)
To: American Quilter
I’d settle for only letting living people vote, and only with ID.
Same result, the percentage of elected democrats would promptly drop to the single digits.
161 posted on
10/17/2007 12:51:50 PM PDT by
null and void
(Lib-uh-rulz can't foresee even the clearest consequences to their actions...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson