Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Warns Putin Over 'World War Three'
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 10-17-2007 | Matthew Moore and Adrian Blomfield

Posted on 10/17/2007 10:29:32 AM PDT by blam

Bush warns Putin over 'World War Three'

By Matthew Moore and Adrian Blomfield
Last Updated: 6:10pm BST 17/10/2007

George W Bush, the US president, today warned that world leaders risk helping bring about "World War Three" unless they do more to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons.

David Blair: No warmth or trust behind the handshake Leader: Vladimir Putin in Teheran In remarks timed to coincide with Russian president Vladimir Putin's visit to Teheran, Mr Bush said the Islamic republic must remain isolated until it drops its nuclear ambitions.

New best friends: Vladimir Putin and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad after their meeting in Teheran

"We've got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel," Mr Bush told a White House press conference.

"So I've told people that, if you're interested in avoiding World War Three, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon."

Mr Bush's pointed statement follows the warm words exchanged by Mr Putin and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, at an historic summit in Teheran this week.

After their meeting Mr Putin repeated Moscow's line that there is no evidence to suggest Iran wants to build a nuclear bomb, and pledged to continue helping the country develop its civil nuclear technology.

As the first Kremlin leader to visit Iran since Josef Stalin in 1943, he also secured the vital backing of Azerbaijan in a five-nation pact by the Caspian states to prevent the US from using the region as a staging ground for military action against Iran.

Mr Bush added today that he had no doubts that Russia appreciated the dangers of a nuclear Iran.

But he said that he wished to speak to Mr Putin about his meeting with Ayatollah Khamenei, the supreme Iranian leader, during which he is said to have suggested a new proposal to end the nuclear stand-off.

"I'm looking forward to getting President Putin's read-out from the meeting," Mr Bush said.

"The thing I'm interested in is whether or not he continues to harbor the same concerns that I do.

"I will continue to work with Russia as well as other nations to keep a focused effort on sending Iran a message that you will remain isolated if you continue your nuclear weapons ambitions."

Although Russia lent its reluctant backing to two United Nations resolutions imposing sanctions on Iran, it has been stridently opposed to escalating the penalties after Teheran refused to stop its uranium enrichment programme.

Among Western diplomats, opinion is divided as to whether Russia — which has little to gain from a nuclear Iran — will eventually acquiesce.

Emboldened by its vast energy resources and desperate to reclaim its status as a global power, Russia could also stand to gain by seeing the United States dragged into a new, controversial and potentially debilitating Middle East conflict.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; iran; iraniannukes; israel; putin; redjihad; russia; syria; war; warns; ww3; wwiii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last
To: GOP_1900AD

You have no nukes and nothing to win.


121 posted on 10/17/2007 2:40:52 PM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

We (the People) have quite a few of them. That would include you and I.


122 posted on 10/17/2007 3:30:25 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti

When you face THE GOD of the universe, him providing acceptable answers to your questions will be the least of your concerns.


123 posted on 10/17/2007 3:36:33 PM PDT by 3090VMXA (The wise man gives up what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD; Paul Ross; Thunder90; Tailgunner Joe; Jeff Head

This has been an interesting thread. A couple of parting thoughts.

First one is, there were similar debates in the UK, prior to WW2. Churchill was labeled a warmonger and a nut case. We also had similar things going in the US which were even more potent. Isolationists managed to keep us from doing the right thing for way too long. We kicked the can down the road. We were in bad shape in 1941.

Second one is, there is a book. The title is “While America Sleeps.” Very prophetic - written prior to the EP-3 incident and 9/11, two events which, when viewed from the distant future, will be considered highly significant. In this book, Kagan and Kagan pull no punches and call our naivete about what lies ahead what it is - shameful. I urge you all to read this book before it is too late.

Then, take action. Vote as if our survival depends on it. Organize. Foment reform. Prepare. Take back the GOP. Take back the USA. So much is possible. Take the first step today.


124 posted on 10/17/2007 3:37:43 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: 3090VMXA

When I face him, I hope to have a mutual understand of my curiosity and questions. I expect a fatherly exchange, not fire and brimstone like a druken abuser.


125 posted on 10/17/2007 4:00:51 PM PDT by Tolsti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti

Liar. You were told each time why you were banned: Troll. Look it up.

Buh bye, Troll.


126 posted on 10/17/2007 4:09:26 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider
...all through history evil maniacs have tried to genocide the Jews and failed. Oddmadinajob and Putin will also fail.....

Foolish evil men...it's almost frightening to see them inviting their own destruction so brazenly.

127 posted on 10/17/2007 5:54:45 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti
Basically, God has a lot to answer for if he exists. And it better be a LOT more intelligent and realistic than his attempt in Job.

I'm sure God is just shaking at the prospect of being cross-examined by you.

128 posted on 10/17/2007 6:04:03 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: blam

Good for President Bush! We need to stick up for Israel and bomb these idiots (Putin and Nutjob) before they wipe entire nations off the map.


129 posted on 10/17/2007 6:32:53 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (Star Wars teaches us a foreboding lesson--evil emperors start out as Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

I will fight until I see the thermonukes coming over the horizon. Then, more than likely, I’ll be on the roof of my house with a six pack and a catcher’s mitt.


130 posted on 10/17/2007 7:10:26 PM PDT by Shaun_MD ("Republic of Texas")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Actually, the direct effects of even a large nuclear explosion are limited to a fairly small radius. The biggest nuclear explosion of all time, the 57MT test shot of the Soviet RDS-220 "Ivan" (aka "Tsar Bomba") on October 30, 1961, only had a destructive radius about 120 miles wide. A terrorist weapon is likely going to be in the range of twenty KT or less – a tactical weapon, by modern standards. A 20KT explosion (roughly the size of the Nagasaki blast) has an effective destructive radius of about 3,000 m — a shade under two miles. Those inside this circle would bear the full brunt of the explosion and most would die. Those in the area immediately adjacent to this 4-mile-wide circle would survive the heat, light, and blast of the bomb. (Many inside the circle with the presence of mind to "duck and cover" would also survive.) Fallout from a ground burst would be a problem, but so long as the affected areas were evacuated for a couple of weeks, most of the harmful radiation would be gone.

And that's for a military-grade weapon. A terrorist is way more likely to have a home-brew job of much less power — a half-kiloton or so. A bomb like that will wreck a city block and contaminate the area immediately downwind, but is unlikely to start a firestorm or contaminate the environment over a large area.

The key to surviving a nuclear attack is to zig when the bomb zags, i.e. to be somewhere else when it goes off. In everyday real-world terms, this means keeping your eyes and ears open for suspicious activities and/or vehicles (an otherwise ordinary van riding extremely low on its suspension, say), especially near high-value targets like stadiums, government buildings, landmarks, etc. Since the odds of any given person being within the "circle of death" caused by a terrorist weapon is fairly low, it's best to plan for a day after the Day After.

131 posted on 10/17/2007 7:25:53 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

You misunderstand me. I am speaking of economic/infrastructure effects.

One thing I liked about the show Jericho, they understood how these things cascade. Our population would not take well to living in the style our grandparents did, let alone our nineteenth century ancestors in the case of a high altitude EMP attack.


132 posted on 10/17/2007 7:34:32 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Thank you. I’m not trying to convert anyone, by the way; I’m just sharing reaity as I have experienced it.


133 posted on 10/17/2007 7:48:39 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Oh, I agree. I’m convinced that any use of nuclear weapons by anyone — here, there, or anywhere — will throw the markets and the economies of the world into chaos, and kick off a major economic disaster, maybe even a global depression. For that reason alone we must prevent any other country from acquiring nuclear weapons, and must not use them ourselves except as a last-resort guarantee of national survival.


134 posted on 10/17/2007 7:50:10 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

I understand. Conversion comes from within, not from without.


135 posted on 10/17/2007 8:15:27 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Good. You’re being deployed tomorrow at 0600.


136 posted on 10/17/2007 9:13:34 PM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
I think what Bush is saying is that if Russia helps Iran get nukes and they are used against us or an ally, it is the same as if Russia attacked us directly.?

BINGO

137 posted on 10/17/2007 9:17:57 PM PDT by GOPJ (When it makes you mad -- "ping & grrrr" -- Freeper:pandoraou812)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti; Zuben Elgenubi
"God is a B83, and we need him to protect us actively. IMO."

56 posted on 10/17/2007 11:57:56 AM PDT by Tolsti

Is Tolsti a mutant from the movie 'Beneath the Planet of the Apes'? If so does he look like this when he takes his mask off?

The unmasked mutants and their god - a nuclear bomb - from the movie 'Beneath the Planet of the Apes'.

138 posted on 10/17/2007 10:16:28 PM PDT by Terirem ("As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books" St. John of Damascus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
But what if the delivery system is a sea container embeded in a load of hundreds, on a container ship in the port of Los Angeles or New York.

Or the device assembled on the target in a rented urban warehouse, disquised as a working shop of some kind and supplied with detonation material smuggled in.

The F-18's or B1's or Star Wars defense systems won't be much help in a scenario like that, especially since there may not be a clear target to retaliate against except some renegade pirates working mercenary

139 posted on 10/17/2007 10:31:44 PM PDT by KTM rider (Free Mexico ....Viva La Revolucion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
That being said: not one of us is guaranteed a single minute more of life upon this earth. Our own personal "end of the world" can come at any time. Instead of worrying about global nuclear war, let us resolve to live our lives accordingly.

Good advice. While we remain here we should consider whether our actions are of benefit or do harm.

140 posted on 10/17/2007 11:30:03 PM PDT by TigersEye (Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson