Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Morgan Stanley sells stake in New York Times: report
Marketwatch ^ | October 17, 2007 | David B. Wilkerson

Posted on 10/17/2007 4:37:47 PM PDT by NRG1973

CHICAGO (MarketWatch) -- Morgan Stanley Investment Management has sold its 7.2% stake in New York Times Co., according to a published report Wednesday.

The money management arm of Morgan Stanley Co. sold its nearly 10.4 million shares in the newspaper publisher, according to a report on The Wall Street Journal's online edition. See Wall Street Journal story (subscription required).

A

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: nyt
I wonder how long the Ochs-Sulzberger family can hold out with stuff like this going on.
1 posted on 10/17/2007 4:37:49 PM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Yep.......


2 posted on 10/17/2007 4:41:14 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Welcome to FreeRepublic!!......Try the search feature!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

The “greater Fool” theory at work? Sold to WHO!?


3 posted on 10/17/2007 4:42:57 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

I also wonder if this will start a big selloff for NYT stock. No one wants to be the last to sell a falling stock so there could be a “race” to sell the stock before it drops too much.


4 posted on 10/17/2007 4:43:38 PM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
A full article on the subject -- no subscription needed.
5 posted on 10/17/2007 4:46:18 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

If there was ever an appropriate post for a Dinosaur Media Watch alert, this was it. NYT is in big trouble, it seems to me.


6 posted on 10/17/2007 4:46:19 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
NYT is in big trouble, it seems to me.

Oh dear God I hope so!

7 posted on 10/17/2007 4:49:26 PM PDT by appleharvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
This has been posted a zillion times today.

But really, that is OK with me.

I LOVE reading it.

Over and over. Really! :-)

8 posted on 10/17/2007 4:55:08 PM PDT by Gorzaloon (Food imported from China = "Cesspool + Flavor-Straw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

The pomposity of the liberals in charge is such that they will put this ship hard aground. IMHO & Hope it will be an “Icon”...it’s destruction that is. It will symbolize a break with the moral and societal depravity that the NY Times celebrates, the race bating, the bias, etc, etc. Its implosion, in time, will be an Iconic event of the beginning of the 21th Century.

Or, not


9 posted on 10/17/2007 5:05:48 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
The “greater Fool” theory at work? Sold to WHO!?

I'm not sure who would, but someone who supposedly is smart enough to avoid such dead cats but was nonetheless interested was the gayboy David Geffen. He was reportedly interested in buying the L.A. Times. For a while, I couldn't understand why a smart billionaire such as geffen would want damaged goods. But then I remembered from my reading of his unauthorized biography The Operator that he rose in part by damaging his enemies through negative rumors about them. A newspaper would give him an even greater weapon for smearing his enemies.

I'm guessing this would be one motiviation for someone to want a news outlet, no matter how doomed the venture will ulitmately be.

10 posted on 10/17/2007 5:18:03 PM PDT by Vision Thing (The liberal Holy Trinity: big government, hollywood, and the globe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
I'm guessing this would be one motiviation for someone to want a news outlet, no matter how doomed the venture will ulitmately be.

IMHO, if the NYT would report the news rather than editorializing the news and stop being the news, the paper might work out. But, that will never happen. So, never mind. The ole leopard thing!

11 posted on 10/17/2007 5:26:05 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Officially Fredbacker1 but don't know how to change my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson