It is not arrogance. It is written.
The only way to justify any other position is to deny the truth. There is no magic in "the first trimester". a baby isn't suddenly alive at 90 days and not alive before that time.
Within our justice system, a man who murders a pregnant woman is charged with two murders, no matter what month the pregnancy is in. It is ludicrous to claim there is a baby in that case, but not a baby when the mother decides to kill her own child.
It is simply a murder of convenience, a selfish act generally performed as the short sighted solution to acts of hedonism and adultery. To allow such a thing only supports the act, and will encourage all the more participation, as suddenly there is no apparent consequence.
It is also readily apparent that abortion and it's partner birth-control have driven the so called sexual revolution of the sixties, as they supposedly remove from society the natural consequences of "sexual freedom". The more it is legitimized, the more it will occur, and the more the result: MORE BASTARD CHILDREN, AND MORE DEAD BABIES.
This is not a matter of freedom, nor is it a matter of choice. It is just evilness and irresponsibility.
Everyone that doesn't exactly agree with you must be evil. No one can disagree with the almighty you without being wrong?
No, no one can disagree with Almighty GOD. He said "Thou shalt not kill", not little ol' me... Take it up with Him. And yes, BTW, it is EVIL by definition. What could be more evil than the taking of life from the most innocent among us? What evil is beyond us if we will do even this?
Check out what God has to say to those who "pass their children through the fire", because it is much the same thing. Those children, burnt alive on the alters of Baal and Ashteroth were the product of orgiastic religious service... Yes, "Love-ins". The offering as sacrifice served the same exact function as abortion does today- Societal birth control. Jehovah spends many a word saying how heinous those acts are to Him.
So someone who is pro-life in most cases yet supports or is undecided on the morning after pill is just as evil as someone who supports abortion on demand? Many pro-lifers in your view must be evil then.
Yes it is just as evil. Why wouldn't it be? Is the child less dead?
Why then is there not agreement on abortion even on the pro-life side if the truth is so plain?
By and large there is agreement that abortion is wrong. Especially on the pro-life side. What seems to be the issue is whether a woman has a choice to kill her own child or not, and when that "choice" ends.
So every matter on earth is written as to what is black and white? Or is it rather your interpretation of things. I would venture to say its the latter and not the former or there would not be large disagreement on issues. My original point was not to argue about the first trimester label to point out the arrogance that one has to have to assume they are correct in all matter.
It's certainly amazing that you cannot see the difference between someone who is pro-life yet supports the morning after pill and someone who supports abortion on demand. If your criteria is that a life is lost then by that logic you have to agree that someone who is negligent, runs a stop sign and kills someone is just as evil as someone who kills another in cold blood so long as the only criteria is that a life is lost.
By and large there is agreement that abortion is wrong. Especially on the pro-life side. What seems to be the issue is whether a woman has a choice to kill her own child or not, and when that "choice" ends.
There is a large amount of disagreement on the pro-life side about abortion, even if the general agreement is that abortion is wrong . Abortion in the case of rape, incest and life of the mother is one. The morning after pill is another. Even the use of contraceptives is an area of disagreement as shown by your statement. Where do these fall in your black and white view? I know you've already admitted "gray" in the rape/incest view, but what of the other two?