Skip to comments.
(U.K.)Christian couple forced to quit fostering after refusing to tell kids its 'good to be gay'
The Daily Mail (U.K.) ^
| October 23, 2007
| JAMES MILLS
Posted on 10/23/2007 10:45:18 AM PDT by Stoat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
"They said we would even have to take a teenager to gay association meetings. How can I do that when it's totally against what I believe?"
Religious campaigners say the couple are the latest victims of new equality laws which they say put gay rights above religious beliefs.
Please say a prayer for Great Britain
1
posted on
10/23/2007 10:45:22 AM PDT
by
Stoat
To: scripter; DBeers; little jeremiah; wagglebee
2
posted on
10/23/2007 10:46:46 AM PDT
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: NYer; Coleus; narses; Salvation; Pyro7480
3
posted on
10/23/2007 10:48:08 AM PDT
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Stoat
“Officials told the couple they would be required to discuss same-sex relationships with children as young as 11 and tell them that gay partnerships were just as acceptable as heterosexual marriages.”
______
That’s the goal!
5
posted on
10/23/2007 10:49:41 AM PDT
by
rightinthemiddle
(Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: rightinthemiddle
Why does the left obsess over sexualizing children?
Do they not realize the carnage that they will create by requiring this to be taught?
Brothers, do not forget for the liberals, Christians are to be supressed and homosexuals are heroes.
No wonder the UK is going down the loo....
7
posted on
10/23/2007 10:53:17 AM PDT
by
padre35
(Conservative in Exile/ No more miller brewing products, pass it on....)
To: Stoat
Keeping kids out of religious homes is exactly what these social engineers want.
I think the smart thing to do is sign the statement, then continue to parent in the way you feel is best.
To: padre35
It’s because they want to have sex with them.
9
posted on
10/23/2007 11:02:48 AM PDT
by
Kenny500c
To: padre35
Why does the left worry about sexual politics at all when they should be worrying about their souls (most of them should, anyway..)!
10
posted on
10/23/2007 11:02:51 AM PDT
by
JSDude1
(When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
To: Stoat
To: JSDude1
You can’t worry about something you don’t have.
12
posted on
10/23/2007 11:04:42 AM PDT
by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
To: padre35
“Do they not realize the carnage that they will create by requiring this to be taught?”
Carnage is what they want. One needs social works to fix carnage and that means growth of government dependence.
It really is simple — Unfortunately all too obvious to anyone who thinks.
Disgusting that society gets destroyed in the liberal process.
To: Stoat
Religious campaigners say the couple are the latest victims of new equality laws which they say put gay rights above religious beliefs. Almost perfectly stated . . . except that it should not say "gay rights" but "pro-homosexual propaganda."
14
posted on
10/23/2007 11:07:09 AM PDT
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: KingKenrod
I think the smart thing to do is sign the statement, then continue to parent in the way you feel is best.People of Faith such as these will most likely have a difficult time with such a plan, as it is dishonest, even though it would be done for a worthy goal.
Also, if a Government agency were to direct them to involve themselves in a specific homosexual oriented activity and they were to refuse, prosecution would be likely.
I don't get the impression that these good people are made of money, and so an extended incarceration coupled with a massive court challenge is probably not something that they would be able to pursue.
15
posted on
10/23/2007 11:08:11 AM PDT
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Stoat
Liberalism is as big a threat as radical islam.
16
posted on
10/23/2007 11:09:37 AM PDT
by
JZelle
To: Stoat
The Gaystapo Strikes Again!
17
posted on
10/23/2007 11:11:26 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: Kenny500c
"because they want to have sex with them" Not only is that immoral, it's disgustingly true. So the child already is in Foster Care, State Forbid that he actually learns different mores, ones that keep him from engaging in such things.
18
posted on
10/23/2007 11:12:14 AM PDT
by
padre35
(Conservative in Exile/ No more miller brewing products, pass it on....)
To: Stoat
People of Faith such as these will most likely have a difficult time with such a plan, as it is dishonest,Ayn Rand put this in its proper moral perspective when she pointed out something to the effect that a thief who wants the combination to your safe is not entitled to an honest response.
19
posted on
10/23/2007 11:12:27 AM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
To: JZelle
Liberalism is as big a threat as radical islam.
And will be murdered, raped and castrated out of existence once
Islamics get the upper hand.
20
posted on
10/23/2007 11:12:28 AM PDT
by
VOA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson