Instead of the usual counter-productive argument which is designed to divide allies in the gun freedom camp, how about we simply agree that ANY LEGISLATION that ANY LAWYER can write is going to be riddled with "INTERPRETATIONS" meant to insure confusion and endless litigation which we ALWAYS LOSE !!!
As plain as the wording of the 2nd is, we are still fighting an uphill battle to 'prove' what the obvious meaning is and has been for 200 years.
Lets simply put this POS bill where it belongs and get back to taking back our rights ...
Bump to that. Any law is one too many when it comes to firearms nowadays.
It's never a very comforting thought when we realize we only have the rights the majority of nine politically appointed lawyers on the Supreme Court agree we have.