Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tamar1973
NO. but it gives you the approximate timing of the birth of John the Baptist, who was Yeshua's cousin

(1) Either use Yochanan and Yeshua or John and Jesus. If you're going to be affected, use the complete affectation.

(2) His approximate timing of John's birth is based on his unproven assumption that the Abijites served at Sukkot.

As you conceded, your source does not prove that the Abijites did Temple service on Sukkot. So he hasn't proven his date for John's birth, and therefore he hasn't proven his date for Jesus' birth, either.

185 posted on 11/01/2007 6:03:16 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
Actually, it's obvious you didn't listen to the source i posted.

John's papa would have served in the temple in june. Nine months later is passover. 6 months after that is sukkot. John was probably born around passover, and Yeshua was probably born around sukkot.

186 posted on 11/01/2007 8:37:03 AM PDT by Tamar1973 (Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time! (http://www.byj.co.kr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson