[CT-Freeper]

So who do we all think we're talking about here?

Fred Thompson?
Roooodi Giuliani?
Mitt Romney?

[MHT]

We already know that Rudy wasn't faithful to wife #1 (with wife #2) or to wife #2 (with wife #3). Fred Thompson "dated" dozens of trophies and they have all endorsed him. In fact, there are so many of them, they have formed his largest PAC. Bet it isn't Mitt or they would have put it in 2" letters in color on the front page. McCain left his wife who had been injured in a car accident, but that's not new info.

Must be a Democrat.

[RightWhale]

Edwards. Unless there is yet another scandal breaking.

[Rick.Donaldson]

I think it’s Bill.... Clinton. LOL

[N3WBI3]

Might not be a (R) but if it is (and if it is a leading candidate) its probably Romney:

Rudy already has lost the family values plank, not allot to lose.

Thompson is already known as having been something of a play boy when divorced, not allot to lose.

The only think Mitt has going is that picture perfect family life, it helps to distract from center left positions in MA for more than a decade..

—

Then again it could be Hillary, Obama or Edwards...

[hgro]

None of the above, its Queen Hillary.

[gondramB]

>>So who do we all think we’re talking about here?

Fred Thompson?
Roooodi Giuliani?
Mitt Romney?<<

If they could take out a Republican, why wait?

Unless the sex scandal is that one of the men is gay - that’s an outing the Press might view as an ethical issue.

[Natural Law]

I suspect it is a Dem. A juicy story about a Rep would already have been headlines for the last two weeks. The two Dem candidates that the press think are worthy of defending are Hillary and Obama. It does make you wonder what transgression they believe the public would find unforgivable.