Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JMack
Here's what he said:

People have asked me, hypothetically, OK it goes back to the states, somebody comes up with a bill, and they say we're going to outlaw this, that, or the other, and my response was, I do not think it is a wise thing to criminalize young girls, and perhaps their parents as aiders and abettors, and perhaps their family physician. And that's what your talking about. It's not a 'sense of the Senate;' you're talking about potential criminal law.

It sounds to me like he is personally opposed to abortion, but is not comfortable with it being illegal.

23 posted on 11/08/2007 1:41:46 AM PST by FreePoster (Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: FreePoster

Fact of the matter is that if Fred were president and the issue went the way he proposes it wouldn’t be up to him, it would be up to the states. While he might vote one way in his state it would not impact me in NC.

What gets me is those here who nanny state everything. They don’t disagree with the tobacco and food nannies, they just don’t like their targets.


142 posted on 11/08/2007 6:24:04 AM PST by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: FreePoster

So is Rudy and Mitt, if you’re really pro life you have to look at other (R’s)


234 posted on 11/08/2007 10:19:29 AM PST by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson