Thompson's low is 15, Mitt the phony's low is 10. Thompson's high is much higher too (and can easily get those back). Mitt has outspent all candidates by far. Guess who's not doing that well based on the data? Romney, of course.
But Mitt has something Fred does not... early State primary support. Will that matter in this years compressed primary? Only time will tell, but he has a much more credible pathway to the Presidency than Fred does.
Be that as it may, given the trends, it should not surprise anyone if Romney passes Thompson in Rasmussen's polls in the near future.
Thompson's high is much higher too (and can easily get those back).
I won't blame you for hoping.
Mitt has outspent all candidates by far. Guess who's not doing that well based on the data? Romney, of course.
Lacking the name recognition of Giuliani and Thompson - and all the media hype - Romney's doing quite well. And he's kicking butt in the early states, a strategy which may be his ticket for a rocket ride to the top. Wait and see.
>>>Mitt has outspent all candidates by far. Guess who’s not doing that well based on the data? Romney, of course.<<<
Guess who is holding double digit leads in the earliest primary states and could well take the first 6 (IA, NH, SC, MI, WY, NV)?
If that happened, it would be game, set, match. Really, if Romney took South Carolina after wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, you could say the exact same thing.
Romney would be the nominee. Support would hemorrage from Giuliani.
And that would be a very good thing.