[Mrs. Don-o]

I did not propose that no economic activity can be regulated. I was asked what specific provision in the Constitution authorizes sellers to decide what they want to sell, and I answered that this is ordinarily an unenumerated right under the 9th and 10th Amendments.

The state can enact reasonable regulations, but in this case I say they ought not require the provision of harmful and lethal drugs. This is not a matter of individual whimsy. It has been an explicit part of medical ethics for 2500 years.

[edsheppa]

The state can enact reasonable regulations

So far as I know, states have plenary authority to regulate economic activity except where it would contravene some specific prohibition. Can you point to even a single example of the Court rejecting a state regulation based on the 9th or 10th Amendment?