Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

The silt evidence seems a bit muddled, if their theory held, they would find particles in the silt of their impact, and they haven’t found any.

Unless of course the Smoking Man actually has the particles and Mulder and Sculley are trying to find both.../s


35 posted on 11/14/2007 10:30:43 PM PST by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: padre35; Swordmaker
It appears that they investigated on-site and dug samples, then went back home and processed things and images - and, after looking at the overhead pictures, then “discovered” the crater might be under the lake.

So, efforts going back (braving the tens of billions of mosquitoes again! - will likely be focused on the lake area, so after next year they might find residue under the lake sediments.


Imagine a “slushy” comet - not a solid single rock or iron mass like a meteor/asteroid remnant. Then, near impact, it builds up enough air pressure/shock wave in front of itself to slow, heat up, and blow itself to bits: so the natural result is a slowing of the mass: not an acceleration away from the original mass like you would see from an internal explosion.

Random shock waves would not create all equal masses of pieces - so one large piece could get pushed up and away from the original trajectory (assume most the comet mass blew up at altitude at some flat (not vertical) angle to earth). Then you would see some large masses go sideways and impact at slower speeds.

38 posted on 11/14/2007 10:51:20 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson