Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clean coal test traps 95 percent carbon: Norway firm (Won't be good enough for the eco-terrorist)
Reuters ^ | 11/16/2007 | Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent

Posted on 11/16/2007 6:25:07 AM PST by tobyhill

OSLO (Reuters) - Tests of a new technology for capturing greenhouse gases from coal-fired power plants have achieved 95 percent cuts in a step towards new ways to fight climate change, a Norwegian company said on Friday.

"It's a breakthrough for us," Henrik Fleischer, chief executive of Sargas technology group, said of tests held since October of a prototype at the Vartan power plant, run by Finnish energy group Fortum (FUM1V.HE: Quote, Profile, Research) in Stockholm.

"A competitive coal-fired power plant with carbon dioxide capture could be built today with this technology," he told Reuters. "It could produce energy at competitive costs."

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 11/16/2007 6:25:09 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Sweet! We should retrofit every coal fired plant in the nation with it and go electric car immediately.


2 posted on 11/16/2007 6:27:01 AM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Anyone with any brains knows this is the way to go...together with the drilling in Alaska and other areas.


3 posted on 11/16/2007 6:28:06 AM PST by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Didn’t they just reject a new coal plant in Kansas that was shown to reduce a lot more CO2 emissions over standard coal plants?

You’re right, not good enough for the environ-whackos. And they’ll be the first ones blaming Bush for higher electric costs.


4 posted on 11/16/2007 6:30:16 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Anyone with any brains knows this is the way to go...together with the drilling in Alaska and other areas.

Assuming the global warming alarmists scare-mongering is anywhere near true, but nuclear power would also make sense.

5 posted on 11/16/2007 6:31:29 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: domenad
The eco-terrorist will find something wrong with it the same way they’ve crapped on the nuclear energy market.
6 posted on 11/16/2007 6:31:39 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
They’ll challenge any attempts to build anywhere in the 9th Circuit and somehow connect it to that district even if it’s in Alabama.
7 posted on 11/16/2007 6:33:33 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Curious...since plants use CO2, perhaps an infrastructure could be built similar to that of natural gas delivery where captured C02 is delivered to farms to improve food yields.

Would pumping C02 into the air in a cornfield, for example, improve growth and also process the C02 into O2?


8 posted on 11/16/2007 6:36:45 AM PST by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

“You’re right, not good enough for the environ-whackos.”
You’re right. They’ll want it to be closer to 100%. And when you try to eke out those last few %points, things get fabulously expensive, essentially rendering the whole effort a useless waste of time and money. I know, because I have to deal with the EPA on a daily basis.


9 posted on 11/16/2007 6:40:50 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
"Anyone with any brains knows this is the way to go."

I have a brain, and it sure isn't obvious to me. What do you do with millions of tons of pressurized C02 gas?

10 posted on 11/16/2007 6:41:01 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
Why yes it would. What you are describing is what every eco-idiot refuses to acknowledge, plants need CO2 to survive and in return we get Oxygen to survive then as we exhale the plants get more CO2. This is also why scientist believe talking to a plant actually helps it grow.
11 posted on 11/16/2007 6:44:07 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
Chemical plants that make fertilizers would snatch it up.
12 posted on 11/16/2007 6:45:23 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Rising Carbon Dioxide Is Great for Plants

http://www.purgit.com/co2ok.html


13 posted on 11/16/2007 6:52:15 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Make dry ice ?


14 posted on 11/16/2007 6:53:30 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Very good idea. It can be sent to 3rd world nations as a refrigerant.
15 posted on 11/16/2007 6:54:50 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Not to mention all the bars and taverns in the world where beer kegs are chilled with CO2 bottles. First shipments should be to the UK.


16 posted on 11/16/2007 6:57:42 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

You are on a roll.


17 posted on 11/16/2007 7:01:02 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

CO2 is not used in fertilizer.


18 posted on 11/16/2007 7:06:53 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Not to mention all the bars and taverns in the world where beer kegs are chilled with CO2 bottles.

The CO2 is released into the keg to force out the beer. It is better than pushing in air, because they air will allow the beer to go flat, the CO2 will not.

It really isn't used to keep the beer cold, although it dies cool as it expands into a gas, so it does have some cooling effect.

19 posted on 11/16/2007 7:09:09 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"Rising Carbon Dioxide Is Great for Plants"

You have millions of tons of it, it is pressurized, it is located at powerplants, and you can't release it into the air. How do you inject it into the plants, and then prevent the plants from decomposing, which releases the CO2 back into the air?

20 posted on 11/16/2007 7:09:51 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson