Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

The NTSB also came up with a similar simulation.

Neither Boeing nor the NTSB could explain why, if the center wing tank exploded (which is also the center wing box,) the wings didn’t immediately depart the aircraft instead of hanging on for 10 seconds as the aircraft pitched up 3,200 feet, and all four engines continued to provide thrust. Boeing builds them good, but not that good.

If they got such a basic and fundamental aerodynamic fact wrong, how can anyone believe the remainder of the NTSB’s conclusions?


145 posted on 11/21/2007 9:43:37 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Well it seems to me that the TWA 800 investigation fell into the same category as a few other government investigations in the same relative time frame.

Bits and pieces of those determinations were also shown to have been very problematic. There were facets of four additional investigations that made it quite clear we weren’t getting the straight scoop.


146 posted on 11/21/2007 10:03:46 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Why did they HAVE to explain that? It wasn’t relevant to the crash. Once the explosion occurred, it was a done deal.


149 posted on 11/21/2007 3:51:05 PM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson