Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Rescues Hillary
News Max ^ | 11/23/07 | Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

Posted on 11/24/2007 10:15:19 AM PST by CT

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: CT

Your tag line is an outright lie. Thompson -did- vote to impeach Clinton on obstruction of justice, so your claim that he “refused to convict” him is complete bull. Such classless mendacity is the sort of thing I expect from liberals, not from Freepers.

Qwinn


21 posted on 11/24/2007 10:29:48 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

“..Hillary Clinton has the most chance of winning the democrat nomination ..”

Of course. But look at the opposition.

She’s HARDLY suitable to hold any elected office in the Country and has ZERO executive exerpience.

Just another dumb Bushicism.


22 posted on 11/24/2007 10:31:32 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
I don't consider NewsMax a reliable source.

Carolyn

23 posted on 11/24/2007 10:32:50 AM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Hillary Clinton is one of the meanest, nastiest, most arrogant, most fake, most dull, most uncharismatic people to ever run for President. Even if she becomes the democrat nominee in the general elections the majority of real voters will realize this many fatal flaws in her character at an early stage of the campaign and before they know anything about her socialist politics, her huge flips flops, and her extreme left wing stand on social issues. The majority of voters will be turned away by her horrible character, her very annoying unbearable to hear nasty and screeching voice, her bitc** laughter, and her scary wide open mean eyes. She cannot change her character no matter how hard she tries and the liberal media cannot cover it for her no matter how hard they try.


24 posted on 11/24/2007 10:33:35 AM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CT

It’s like the Mad Hatter party.


25 posted on 11/24/2007 10:35:47 AM PST by 444Flyer ("Oly Oly Oxen Free!" Matt 3:1-3, Rev 22:17,John 3:1-36, Jude 9, Eph 6, Rev 12:11, Jer 29:13-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

Also, i’m not convinced that a voice of support from bush is a good thing for any candidate.


26 posted on 11/24/2007 10:36:17 AM PST by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CT
The Bush family would be very happy with another Clinton presidency. They have been sweeping each other’s messes under the rug for 20 years. If a Republican like Tancredo was nominated by the Republicans, Bush would campaign openly for Hillary if he thought that would help her chances.

That is why “end the Clinton-Bush Diarchy” would be a good campaign slogan for a conservative or third party candidate if Hillary gets the Dem nomination.

27 posted on 11/24/2007 10:37:39 AM PST by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
Anything morris says about hillary should be viewed through his hate-colored glasses. he hates the clintons so much he’s not able to be rational about them. Thus, anybody who doesn’t hate hillary as much as he does is “helping” her.

I understand all that. And the point of this post isn't about what Morris thinks. In fact I think he doesn't make heads or tails of it either. Just speculates.

My point, and the central question, and it isn't exactly conspiratorial, is why do the Bushes give their political enemies any breaks. This goes to Bush I agreeing to the tax increase. Letting Kennedy write the Education Bill. George W. saying all those glittering lies about the Clintons when they unveiled their portraits. And now this soft ball about Hillary.

Nothing wrong with being nice and having class, something some Freepers could learn here. But helping someone as bad as the Clintons - any Clinton - is where one should draw the line.

28 posted on 11/24/2007 10:39:18 AM PST by CT (Thompson wouldn't convict Clinton, and now I won't vote Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan; The Invisible Hand
BINGO! You’re in a roll today!


29 posted on 11/24/2007 10:39:47 AM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
You guys are pathetic idiots.

Now now. You don't know if they are, as individuals, pathetic idiots just because their viewpoints are pathetic and idiotic.

30 posted on 11/24/2007 10:43:28 AM PST by Jeff Chandler ("Liberals want to save the world for the children they aren't having." -Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CT

This is just one news sources interpretation of what was said, however:

Things like this, and there are quite a few, push me towards the conspiracy theory that there are only a handful of behind the sconces people running the world. If a favorite starts to lag, someone gets pushed into saying things someone loyal to their party wouldn’t.

As someone up-thread pointed out, these aren’t the words of a person with class.


31 posted on 11/24/2007 10:49:15 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

The biggest mysteries Bush has pulled surround Sandy Berger. Why he would let him skip out of that blatant breach cannot be explained.


32 posted on 11/24/2007 10:51:57 AM PST by CT (Thompson wouldn't convict Clinton, and now I won't vote Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
Qwinn:

Read Ann Coulter more completely, then get back to me. It's why she won't vote for Fred either.

33 posted on 11/24/2007 10:54:10 AM PST by CT (Thompson wouldn't convict Clinton, and now I won't vote Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CT
The biggest mysteries Bush has pulled surround Sandy Berger. Why he would let him skip out of that blatant breach cannot be explained.

Agreed. Thus my comment on the conpiracy theory that a handful of behind the scenes men run the show. That would explain it.

34 posted on 11/24/2007 11:04:22 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CT

Another attempt by Bush to show his contempt of the American people.


35 posted on 11/24/2007 11:05:53 AM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CT
I’ve wondered about that myself. I know I’m going to get flamed for saying this but IMO there IS a secret group of people (and maybe some of them ARE in the public eye) who actually run this country and probably the world.
36 posted on 11/24/2007 11:07:21 AM PST by proudofthesouth (IMO homosexuals and transgenders are mentally ill !))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

I know it’s not “We the people” who run things any longer. If we ever did.

Regards


37 posted on 11/24/2007 11:14:12 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Perchant
Bush would campaign openly for Hillary if he thought that would help her chances.

Bullcrap

38 posted on 11/24/2007 11:23:54 AM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CT

What if President Bush had said he didn’t think Hillary would win the presidency. That would also give her a ‘boost’. It’s hilarious that this article was written at all about the man the dems love to hate, the stupid, brainless, chimpy mcbushhitler.


39 posted on 11/24/2007 11:25:34 AM PST by Theresawithanh (FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh
What if President Bush had said he didn’t think Hillary would win the presidency. That would also give her a ‘boost’.

He did, according to the NY Post article:

Bush called Clinton a "very formidable candidate" who he said understands the "klieg lights" that go with presidential politics.

But, he said, "I do believe our candidate will beat her, if she happens to be the nominee."

BUSHES HAIL HILL: CALL HER BEST DEM TO HANDLE PREZ JOB
40 posted on 11/24/2007 11:34:31 AM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson