[robertpaulsen]

"It says nothing about regulating private firearms ownership for non-criminal uses."

Even if found to be an individual right, Washington, DC may regulate their use -- for example, children under 6 may not keep and bear handguns. Or do you have a problem with a law like that because it infringes the right of the people to keep and bear arms?

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

Even if found to be an individual right, Washington, DC may regulate their use -- for example, children under 6 may not keep and bear handguns. Or do you have a problem with a law like that because it infringes the right of the people to keep and bear arms?

I thought "the people" were those defined as having the right to vote? I am pretty sure that was one of your earliest arguments to who "the people" are, wasn't it?

You must be worn out moving the goal posts all over the field.

[Dead Corpse]

Or do you have a problem with a law like that because it infringes the right of the people to keep and bear arms?

Always looking for the "loophole" to allow "infringement" aren't you... Even if you have to go to absurd lengths to do so.