That would make most 2008 voters, ummmmm, age 28 or younger. Most? No. Many? Maybe 10%. Is Maureen drinking waaaaaay too heavily again?
If I had made the benchmark 1964 rather than 1980, I would have looked better. I guessed and was wrong, but the point still stands--a significant, at least a third and maybe 40%, will have limited or no experience with events up to 1980. At best they would have been 16 in 1980 and then this figure trails off to zero for those 28 years old (at the time of the 2008) election.
We have a vastly different electorate now and anyone who assumes we can re-fight past battles is going to be disappointed.
You were right! Thanks for the post. I got my figures: HERE.